public inbox for libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: Tadeus Prastowo <tadeus.prastowo@unitn.it>,
	Alexander Kulkov <adamant.pwn@gmail.com>,
	libstdc++ <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PBDS] Rejuvenation
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190724121959.GA7555@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdT5nuo+ttZoipi=q2-pLhRHzKEbEp4BBbV2UOxQWdND5Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 24/07/19 13:18 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 12:58, Tadeus Prastowo <tadeus.prastowo@unitn.it> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> As Jonathan suggested in
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2019-07/msg00066.html, what do you
>> think if we start with: "regenerate the graphs in the documentation
>> that show poor binary heap performance, as mentioned in
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62045"?
>
>Sounds good to me. The data in those graphs are produced by the tests
>in testsuite/performance/ext/pb_ds/*.cc but I'm not sure how the XML
>output of those tests is turned into the PDF and PNG files that are
>included in doc/xml/manual/test_policy_data_structures.xml (and it
>doesn't help that the filenames listed in the docs are wrong, e.g. the
>docs say:
>
>      <para>
>        It uses the test file:
>        <filename>performance/ext/pb_ds/priority_queue_random_int_push_timing.cc</filename>
>      </para>
>
>but actually that should be performance/ext/pb_ds/priority_queue_int_push.cc
>
>You can find the right test file names by grepping in the
>testsuite/performance/ext/pb_ds/ directory for the name in the docs,
>because the test files contain the same name as used in the docs (it
>just doesn't match the actual filename):
>
>master% libstdc++-v3$ git grep priority_queue_random_int_push_timing
>testsuite/performance/ext/pb_ds/
>testsuite/performance/ext/pb_ds/priority_queue_int_push.cc: * @file
>priority_queue_random_int_push_timing_test.cpp
>testsuite/performance/ext/pb_ds/priority_queue_int_push.cc:  cerr <<
>"usage: priority_queue_random_int_push_timing_test <vn> <vs> <vm>" <<
>master% libstdc++-v3$ git grep
>priority_queue_random_int_push_pop_timing
>testsuite/performance/ext/pb_ds/
>testsuite/performance/ext/pb_ds/priority_queue_int_push_pop.cc: *
>@file priority_queue_random_int_push_pop_timing_test.cpp
>testsuite/performance/ext/pb_ds/priority_queue_int_push_pop.cc:
>std::cerr << "usage: priority_queue_random_int_push_pop_timing_test
><vn> <vs> <vm>" <<

That would be easier to read without gmail's auto-wrapping:

master% libstdc++-v3$ git grep priority_queue_random_int_push_timing testsuite/performance/ext/pb_ds/
testsuite/performance/ext/pb_ds/priority_queue_int_push.cc: * @file priority_queue_random_int_push_timing_test.cpp
testsuite/performance/ext/pb_ds/priority_queue_int_push.cc:  cerr << "usage: priority_queue_random_int_push_timing_test <vn> <vs> <vm>" <<
master% libstdc++-v3$ git grep priority_queue_random_int_push_pop_timing testsuite/performance/ext/pb_ds/
testsuite/performance/ext/pb_ds/priority_queue_int_push_pop.cc: * @file priority_queue_random_int_push_pop_timing_test.cpp
testsuite/performance/ext/pb_ds/priority_queue_int_push_pop.cc:  std::cerr << "usage: priority_queue_random_int_push_pop_timing_test <vn> <vs> <vm>" <<



  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-24 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-24 11:58 Tadeus Prastowo
2019-07-24 12:17 ` Alexander Kulkov
2019-07-24 12:25   ` Tadeus Prastowo
2019-08-05 19:08     ` Alexander Kulkov
2019-08-11 21:07       ` Alexander Kulkov
2019-08-12  7:06         ` Tadeus Prastowo
2019-09-26  9:33           ` Alexander Kulkov
2019-09-26 21:40             ` Tadeus Prastowo
2019-09-26 22:15               ` Alexander Kulkov
2019-10-23 16:26                 ` Alexander Kulkov
2019-12-16  7:53                   ` Alexander Kulkov
2019-12-16 21:09                     ` Tadeus Prastowo
2019-07-24 12:18 ` Jonathan Wakely
2019-07-24 12:20   ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
2019-07-24 12:23   ` Tadeus Prastowo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190724121959.GA7555@redhat.com \
    --to=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=adamant.pwn@gmail.com \
    --cc=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=tadeus.prastowo@unitn.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).