From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 102540 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2020 16:21:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libstdc++-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libstdc++-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102531 invoked by uid 89); 13 Jan 2020 16:21:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-17.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_0,GIT_PATCH_1,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=lie, para X-HELO: us-smtp-1.mimecast.com Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (HELO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) (207.211.31.120) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 16:21:28 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1578932486; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=730sc9p/lQki7EdXHvXTLoF9dDw3v/sudVUqgtE0pIs=; b=S8FzC/E4nsF/ILTSFM2SRuDJka3FDps990X0GIqiGAAl+rMlBQpDmQOkDvDLg5h1/htaNA GxCphIWfPilxFrQOKy9ExrFjR63JAwMp6ac0MWqhf/IXlfBMrTirbzi6GTmKvFUj5QEk0u fhEpwN6Ai4h8jB+i7o7A72oeLsdWmDI= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-171-hKyK5BuiP2GpJrvPZvftRA-1; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:21:24 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB9F21007270; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 16:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.33.36.128]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1603D5C1B0; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 16:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 16:49:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Wakely To: Sandra Loosemore Cc: "Eric S. Raymond" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Joseph Myers , libstdc++ Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clean up references to Subversion in documentation sources. Message-ID: <20200113162121.GB60955@redhat.com> References: <20200113140202.GA63759@thyrsus.com> <3f91720b-c6b3-533f-de39-26f200f5cc34@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3f91720b-c6b3-533f-de39-26f200f5cc34@codesourcery.com> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 On 13/01/20 09:09 -0700, Sandra Loosemore wrote: >On 1/13/20 7:02 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote: >>Clean up references to SVN in in the GCC docs, redirecting to Git >>documentation as appropriate. > >This is OK, although the set of changes for the libstdc++ manual like=20 >this gave me pause: > >>diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml b/libstdc++-v= 3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml >>index 2b05ff6601a..cf5722377a6 100644 >>--- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml >>+++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml >>@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ This status table is based on the table of contents of = ISO/IEC 14882:2003. >> >> >>-This page describes the C++ support in mainline GCC SVN, not in any >>+This page describes the C++ support in mainline GCC, not in any >> particular release. >> > >IIUC the statements being modified here are incorrect; since the=20 >manuals are packaged with the GCC sources, they go in lock step with=20 >the source version, and the text of the manual describes the GCC=20 >version being built, not mainline. Perhaps the libstdc++=20 >documentation maintainers would like to correct this separately? I did so on the gcc-7 branch, so it says "This page describes the C++11 support in the GCC 7 series." I have forgotten to do that on the gcc-8 and gcc-9 branches though, so they lie. I'll do that. >For similar reasons, I suggest backporting this patch to all active=20 >GCC release branches, namely GCC 8 and GCC 9, so that manuals packaged=20 >with upcoming releases from those branches will correctly point to the=20 >GIT repository instead of SVN. Agreed.