On 13/01/20 16:21 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>On 13/01/20 09:09 -0700, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>>On 1/13/20 7:02 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>>>Clean up references to SVN in in the GCC docs, redirecting to Git
>>>documentation as appropriate.
>>
>>This is OK, although the set of changes for the libstdc++ manual 
>>like this gave me pause:
>>
>>>diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml
>>>index 2b05ff6601a..cf5722377a6 100644
>>>--- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml
>>>+++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml
>>>@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ This status table is based on the table of contents of ISO/IEC 14882:2003.
>>> </para>
>>> <para>
>>>-This page describes the C++ support in mainline GCC SVN, not in any
>>>+This page describes the C++ support in mainline GCC, not in any
>>> particular release.
>>> </para>
>>
>>IIUC the statements being modified here are incorrect; since the 
>>manuals are packaged with the GCC sources, they go in lock step with 
>>the source version, and the text of the manual describes the GCC 
>>version being built, not mainline.  Perhaps the libstdc++ 
>>documentation maintainers would like to correct this separately?
>
>I did so on the gcc-7 branch, so it says "This page describes the
>C++11 support in the GCC 7 series." I have forgotten to do that on the
>gcc-8 and gcc-9 branches though, so they lie. I'll do that.

Here's what I've committed to releases/gcc-9, I'll do something
similar for gcc-8.