From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [committed] libstdc++: Use __libc_single_threaded for locale initialization
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:26:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201127122629.GS1312820@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201127111510.GR1312820@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2664 bytes --]
On 27/11/20 11:15 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>On 27/11/20 09:43 +0100, Stephan Bergmann via Libstdc++ wrote:
>>On 24/11/2020 15:59, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>>Most initialization of locales and facets happens before main() during
>>>startup, when the program is likely to only have one thread. By using
>>>the new __gnu_cxx::__is_single_threaded() function instead of checking
>>>__gthread_active_p() we can avoid using pthread_once or atomics for the
>>>common case.
>>>
>>>That said, I'm not sure why we don't just use a local static variable
>>>instead, as __cxa_guard_acquire() already optimizes for the
>>>single-threaded case:
>>>
>>> static const bool init = (_S_initialize_once(), true);
>>>
>>>I'll revisit that for GCC 12.
>>>
>>>libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> * src/c++98/locale.cc (locale::facet::_S_get_c_locale())
>>> (locale::id::_M_id() const): Use __is_single_threaded.
>>> * src/c++98/locale_init.cc (locale::_S_initialize()):
>>> Likewise.
>>>
>>>Tested powerpc64le-linux. Committed to trunk.
>>
>>I now started to get weird crashes when running LibreOffice test
>>code at least with Clang -fsanitize=address and latest libstdc++,
>>where the Clang ASan machinery SEGVs while it wants to report some
>>malloc/free issue. That goes away when reverting this commit, and I
>>think the root cause is that locale::facet::_S_initialize_once() now
>>gets called twice: First during __cxx_global_var_init when the
>>process is still single threaded (so
>>
>> if (!__gnu_cxx::__is_single_threaded())
>>
>>in locale::facet::_S_get_c_locale, reading __libc_single_threaded,
>>is false, whereas
>>
>> if (__gthread_active_p())
>>
>>would have been true even if the process still only had a single
>>thread). And again after the process has spawned further threads
>>via pthread_create (flipping __libc_single_threaded) and calls
>>std::ostringstream() -> ... std::locale() -> ..., at which point
>>
>> if (!__gnu_cxx::__is_single_threaded())
>>
>>in locale::facet::_S_get_c_locale is true now.
>
>Gah, yes, that's broken. Sorry. I'm reverting that part and testing
>it now.
>
>I still think we should just use local static variables here and let
>the runtime do the initialization and optimize it for single-threaded,
>but I'll leave that for GCC 12. There might be some reason that wasn't
>done originally, maybe so the library could be built with
>-fno-threadsafe-statics (which I don't think we should support) or
>maybe just because it predates the threadsafe-static code working
>well.
Fixed with this patch, tested powerp64le-linux (glibc 2.32).
Pushed to trunk.
Thanks for the testing and bug report, as always.
[-- Attachment #2: patch.txt --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1771 bytes --]
commit 0d7d69ca4a8c05d883e07ee42058c9c6b0c72370
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Nov 27 11:00:15 2020
libstdc++: Partially revert r11-5314
The changes in r11-5314 are broken, because it means we don't use
__gthread_once for the first few initializations, but after the program
becomes multi-threaded we will repeat the initialization, using
__gthread_once once this time. This leads to memory errors.
The use of __is_single_threaded() in locale::id::_M_id() is OK, because
the side effects are the same either way.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* src/c++98/locale.cc (locale::facet::_S_get_c_locale()):
Revert change to use __is_single_threaded.
* src/c++98/locale_init.cc (locale::_S_initialize()):
Likewise.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale.cc b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale.cc
index 9b3fc3515152..4c1612cc5dca 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale.cc
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
locale::facet::_S_get_c_locale()
{
#ifdef __GTHREADS
- if (!__gnu_cxx::__is_single_threaded())
+ if (__gthread_active_p())
__gthread_once(&_S_once, _S_initialize_once);
else
#endif
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale_init.cc b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale_init.cc
index fc8416ba01a6..c3841ccbd3c9 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale_init.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale_init.cc
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
locale::_S_initialize()
{
#ifdef __GTHREADS
- if (!__gnu_cxx::__is_single_threaded())
+ if (__gthread_active_p())
__gthread_once(&_S_once, _S_initialize_once);
#endif
if (!_S_classic)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-27 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-24 14:59 Jonathan Wakely
2020-11-27 8:43 ` Stephan Bergmann
2020-11-27 11:15 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-11-27 12:26 ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201127122629.GS1312820@redhat.com \
--to=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=sbergman@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).