public inbox for libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Decrease default timeout for libstdc++ tests to 6 minutes
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:35:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201202123522.GO2309743@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201201105222.GF2309743@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2824 bytes --]

On 01/12/20 10:52 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>On 01/12/20 10:45 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 15:58, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>On 27/11/20 21:17 +0100, Christophe Lyon via Libstdc++ wrote:
>>>>On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 17:13, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
>>>><gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The default for the GCC testsuite is 300, i.e. 5 minutes, which is the
>>>>> same as the DejaGnu default.
>>>>>
>>>>> Libstdc++ overrides this to 600, i.e. 10 minutes.
>>>>>
>>>>> This seems ridiculously long. If any test takes that long on modern
>>>>> hardware, something is wrong. We've seen this a lot recently with
>>>>> buggy tests, and waiting for them to FAIL is tedious.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've already made libstdc++.exp respect the user's setting in
>>>>> ~/.dejagnurc or the global site.exp file. This means anybody testing
>>>>> on slow simulators or old hardware can choose their own timeout.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've added dg-timeout-factor to the slowest std::regex tests and have
>>>>> a patch to do it for the PSTL tests, which both take far too long to
>>>>> compile. That means you can choose a sensible timeout appropriate for
>>>>> most tests (e.g. 60 seconds) and not get spurious failures from the
>>>>> few dozen tests which are just very slow.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to change the default to 6 minutes. If that goes well, I'd
>>>>> like to lower it even further.
>>>>>
>>>>> The main benefit of this will be that buggy tests which hang will get
>>>>> killed sooner, so we waste less time waiting for the inevitable
>>>>> timeout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I think that's a good idea, I did have problems sometimes when
>>>>many tests timed out, causing the whole 'make check' to be
>>>>killed before completion by our compute farm management system.
>>>
>>>Thanks for the feedback. I've pushed this patch now.
>>>
>>>It's been tested on powercp64le-linux, x86_64-linux, aarch64-linux,
>>>sparc-solaris and powerpc-aix. They were all fine with much lower
>>>defaults (e.g. 120 seconds). Let's see how this goes for people
>>>testing on older or less powerful hardware.
>>>
>>
>>FTR, I've seen two occurrences of a random timeout:
>>WARNING: program timed out.
>>27_io/basic_istream/get/wchar_t/lwg3464.cc execution test (reason: NONE)
>>FAIL: 27_io/basic_istream/get/wchar_t/lwg3464.cc execution test
>>
>>when testing for aarch64-none-elf with -mabi=ilp32 using Arm's
>>Foundation Model as simulator (an old release).
>
>Yes, that test only runs for target { ! lp64 } and does quite a lot of
>work. It should compile quite quickly, but takes a long time to run
>compared to most tests.
>
>I've add dg-timeout-factor to it and its narrow char counterpart.

Similarly for a couple more tests which do extra work on 32-bit
targets.

Tested x86_64-linux, pushed to trunk.


[-- Attachment #2: patch.txt --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1690 bytes --]

commit 8b2c3b5af3da8d06a59276721263c7f326ed64fd
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Dec 2 12:34:20 2020

    libstdc++: Use longer timeout for istream::gcount() overflow tests
    
    On targets with 32-bit poitners these tests do extra work, so give them
    longer to run.
    
    libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
    
            * testsuite/27_io/basic_istream/ignore/char/94749.cc: Add
            dg-timeout-factor for ilp32 targets.
            * testsuite/27_io/basic_istream/ignore/wchar_t/94749.cc:
            Likewise.

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/basic_istream/ignore/char/94749.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/basic_istream/ignore/char/94749.cc
index 21097c2bff1..63b652dc77b 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/basic_istream/ignore/char/94749.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/basic_istream/ignore/char/94749.cc
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 
 // { dg-do run }
 // { dg-options "-DSIMULATOR_TEST" { target simulator } }
+// { dg-timeout-factor 2 { target ilp32 } }
 
 // PR libstdc++/94749
 // basic_istream::ignore(n, c) discards n+1 if next character is equal to c.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/basic_istream/ignore/wchar_t/94749.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/basic_istream/ignore/wchar_t/94749.cc
index 2473588d307..dcf0fee4906 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/basic_istream/ignore/wchar_t/94749.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/basic_istream/ignore/wchar_t/94749.cc
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 
 // { dg-do run }
 // { dg-options "-DSIMULATOR_TEST" { target simulator } }
+// { dg-timeout-factor 2 { target ilp32 } }
 
 // PR libstdc++/94749
 // basic_istream::ignore(n, c) discards n+1 if next character is equal to c.

      reply	other threads:[~2020-12-02 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-27 16:13 Jonathan Wakely
2020-11-27 20:17 ` Christophe Lyon
2020-11-30 14:58   ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-12-01  9:45     ` Christophe Lyon
2020-12-01 10:52       ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-12-02 12:35         ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201202123522.GO2309743@redhat.com \
    --to=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=christophe.lyon@linaro.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).