From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir V <vv.os.swe@gmail.com>
Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Problem building libstdc++ for the avr target
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 12:49:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201209124933.GU2309743@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+=iAip_JN164_kZhDsd-+ET12Atve7F3aJcnmKCikFteVdDDg@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/12/20 13:32 +0100, Vladimir V wrote:
>Hello.
>
>While testing with the current upstream I encountered a compilation issue.
>Although I build with "--disable-threads" flag the following error occurs:
>
>../../../../../libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/thread.cc:39:4: error: #error "No
>sleep function known for this target"
>
>Previously the check was inside the #ifdef _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS that
>prevented the error from happening (in my case with gcc v10.1),
>So I would like to ask if the thread.cc should be involved in the build if
>the threads support is configured to be disabled?
Yes, the file is always built, but which definitions it contains
depends on what is configured for the target.
The std::this_thread::sleep_for and std::this_thread::sleep_until
functions don't actually depend on threads at all. They just sleep.
But that still requires target support, just different support from
threads.
>And if it should, then can the condition be reworked to cover the described
>case?
Yes, I'll do that. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
I assume we can't use avr-libc's delay functions, because they depend
on the CPU clock frequency, which isn't known when we compile
libstdc++. So I'll just suppress the declarations of those functions
and remove the #error.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-09 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-07 17:32 Vladimir V
2020-12-07 20:30 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-12-07 20:32 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-12-09 0:28 ` Vladimir V
2020-12-09 12:32 ` Vladimir V
2020-12-09 12:49 ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
2020-12-09 17:01 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-12-09 23:00 ` Vladimir V
2020-12-10 17:39 ` Vladimir V
2020-12-10 20:15 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-12-10 20:31 ` Vladimir V
2020-12-15 11:48 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-12-16 7:33 ` Vladimir V
2020-12-07 20:41 ` Keith Packard
2020-12-07 21:06 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-01-04 11:28 ` Vladimir V
2021-01-08 18:21 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-01-22 14:46 ` Vladimir V
2021-02-07 13:55 ` Vladimir V
2021-02-07 18:22 ` Vladimir V
2021-02-07 18:23 ` Keith Packard
2021-02-07 22:33 ` Vladimir V
2021-02-07 23:06 ` Keith Packard
2021-02-08 12:58 ` Vladimir V
2021-02-08 17:38 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-02-08 17:45 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-02-08 17:47 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-02-08 22:25 ` Vladimir V
2021-02-09 10:47 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-02-09 10:54 ` Vladimir V
2021-03-25 9:27 ` Vladimir V
2021-03-25 12:36 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-03-25 18:27 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-03-25 21:37 ` Vladimir V
2021-03-25 23:02 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-03-26 8:25 ` Vladimir V
2020-12-07 21:51 ` Vladimir V
2020-12-07 23:00 ` Keith Packard
2020-12-08 8:12 ` Vladimir V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201209124933.GU2309743@redhat.com \
--to=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=vv.os.swe@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).