From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jwakely@redhat.com>
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F07385782C
 for <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:15:15 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 73F07385782C
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-207-P55UCgDVOHaApkuf-5FalA-1; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:15:13 -0500
X-MC-Unique: P55UCgDVOHaApkuf-5FalA-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 [10.5.11.16])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D3B38144E0;
 Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:15:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.33.36.115])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCAA5C260;
 Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:15:11 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:15:10 +0000
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir V <vv.os.swe@gmail.com>
Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Problem building libstdc++ for the avr target
Message-ID: <20201210201510.GC2309743@redhat.com>
References: <CA+=iAirn_xc2EhxBdwwjr_Ak2bmS4eVHpxoMVR5xKCXghQOH9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20201207203033.GI2309743@redhat.com>
 <20201207203201.GJ2309743@redhat.com>
 <CA+=iAiqh1c9hUO45XUMuffNgZWhWuZOz+1cDhLGbPrXPVMPw0A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+=iAip_JN164_kZhDsd-+ET12Atve7F3aJcnmKCikFteVdDDg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20201209124933.GU2309743@redhat.com>
 <20201209170125.GW2309743@redhat.com>
 <CA+=iAipLUkVs78obkK+sCFhHXrO1NV2RqO0yEs1FKv46fmfWDA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+=iAiqk3Sj4JU-2ZPSuoFZ0EBFkBm8Fa_NyBCxMxvrnGzOd7A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+=iAiqk3Sj4JU-2ZPSuoFZ0EBFkBm8Fa_NyBCxMxvrnGzOd7A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libstdc++ mailing list <libstdc++.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/libstdc++>,
 <mailto:libstdc++-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/>
List-Post: <mailto:libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libstdc++-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libstdc++>,
 <mailto:libstdc++-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:15:16 -0000

On 10/12/20 18:39 +0100, Vladimir V via Libstdc++ wrote:
>Hello.
>
>Could you please have a look at my trivial patch.
>It works as intended with avr-libc and doesn't seem to introduce
>regressions for x86_64 hosts.
>What would be your suggestions for testing?

If you've tested it on AVR then I think that's good enough, as I've
already been testing an identical patch locally :-)

I'll get this committed after the weekend, thanks for the patch!