On 10/03/21 16:57 +0000, Hoyer, David wrote:
>I wanted to finally follow up on these issues I reported.
>
>On issue 1, the patch you provided did fix the problem

Thanks for confirming. It's committed to the master branch now (as
attached to this mail). I also plan to backport it to the active
release branches later.

>On issue 2, I changed our python script to convert it to a string and it now works!

Great. I think it's correct that those constructor methods expect
strings for the 'typename' parameter.