From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5B9385E02D for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:27:16 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 2F5B9385E02D Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-123-kJqRiNWfP2qFklqjDiU3dg-1; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 04:27:14 -0400 X-MC-Unique: kJqRiNWfP2qFklqjDiU3dg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 680EB18D6A2A; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-112-143.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.143]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0447660871; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:27:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 16G8RAPf3578852 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:27:10 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 16G8R9vv3578851; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:27:09 +0200 Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:27:09 +0200 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [committed] libstdc++: Suppress pedantic warnings about __int128 Message-ID: <20210716082709.GD2380545@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libstdc++ mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:27:17 -0000 On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 08:41:06AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote: > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/max_size_type.h > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/max_size_type.h > @@ -417,7 +417,10 @@ namespace ranges > #endif > > #if __SIZEOF_INT128__ > +#pragma GCC diagnostic push > +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wpedantic" > using __rep = unsigned __int128; > +#pragma GCC diagnostic pop At least in simple cases like this, wouldn't using __rep = __extension__ unsigned __int128; be smaller? And it should be more targetted, wouldn't disable other pedantic warnings but about __int128. Jakub