From: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: Add test for std::con/disjunction's base class
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 21:04:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220826010428.2272001-1-ppalka@redhat.com> (raw)
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* testsuite/20_util/logical_traits/requirements/base_classes.cc: New test.
---
.../requirements/base_classes.cc | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/logical_traits/requirements/base_classes.cc
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/logical_traits/requirements/base_classes.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/logical_traits/requirements/base_classes.cc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6699037bb14
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/logical_traits/requirements/base_classes.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
+
+#include <utility>
+
+using std::true_type;
+using std::false_type;
+
+template<int> struct T : std::true_type { };
+template<int> struct F : std::false_type { };
+
+// [meta.logical]/5: The specialization conjunction<B_1, ..., B_n> has a
+// public and unambiguous base that is either:
+// - the first type B_i in the list true_type, B_1, ..., B_n for which
+// bool(B_i::value) is false, or
+// - if there is no such Bi, the last type in the list.
+
+static_assert(std::is_base_of_v<true_type, std::conjunction<>>);
+static_assert(std::is_base_of_v<T<0>, std::conjunction<T<0>>>);
+static_assert(std::is_base_of_v<F<0>, std::conjunction<F<0>>>);
+static_assert(std::is_base_of_v<T<1>, std::conjunction<T<0>, T<1>>>);
+static_assert(std::is_base_of_v<F<0>, std::conjunction<F<0>, F<1>>>);
+static_assert(std::is_base_of_v<F<0>, std::conjunction<T<0>, F<0>, F<1>>>);
+static_assert(std::is_base_of_v<F<0>, std::conjunction<T<0>, F<0>, T<1>, F<1>>>);
+
+// [meta.logical]/10: The specialization disjunction<B_1, ..., B_n> has a
+// public and unambiguous base that is either:
+// - the first type B_i in the list false_type, B_1, ..., B_n for which
+// bool(B_i::value) is true, or
+// - if there is no such Bi, the last type in the list.
+
+static_assert(std::is_base_of_v<false_type, std::disjunction<>>);
+static_assert(std::is_base_of_v<T<0>, std::disjunction<T<0>>>);
+static_assert(std::is_base_of_v<F<0>, std::disjunction<F<0>>>);
+static_assert(std::is_base_of_v<T<0>, std::disjunction<T<0>, T<1>>>);
+static_assert(std::is_base_of_v<F<1>, std::disjunction<F<0>, F<1>>>);
+static_assert(std::is_base_of_v<T<0>, std::disjunction<T<0>, F<0>, F<1>>>);
+static_assert(std::is_base_of_v<T<0>, std::disjunction<T<0>, F<0>, T<1>, F<1>>>);
--
2.37.2.382.g795ea8776b
next reply other threads:[~2022-08-26 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-26 1:04 Patrick Palka [this message]
2022-08-26 8:01 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-08-26 8:01 ` Jonathan Wakely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220826010428.2272001-1-ppalka@redhat.com \
--to=ppalka@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).