From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
To: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Cc: <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] libstdc++: Move stream initialization into compiled library [PR44952]
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 17:10:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221115161053.60D072043F@pchp3.se.axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221104150525.2968778-2-ppalka@redhat.com> (message from Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches on Fri, 4 Nov 2022 16:05:25 +0100)
> From: Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 16:05:25 +0100
> This patch moves the global object for constructing the standard streams
> out from <iostream> and into the compiled library on targets that support
> the init_priority attribute. This means that <iostream> no longer
> introduces a separate global constructor in each TU that includes it.
>
> We can do this only if the init_priority attribute is supported because
> we need to force that the stream initialization runs first before any
> user-defined global initializer in programs that that use a static
> libstdc++.a.
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look right?
> Unfortunately I don't have access to a system that truly doesn't support
> init priorities, so I instead tested that situation by artificially
> disabling the init_priority attribute on x86_64.
>
> PR libstdc++/44952
> PR libstdc++/98108
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> * include/bits/c++config (_GLIBCXX_HAS_ATTRIBUTE): Define.
> (_GLIBCXX_HAVE_ATTRIBUTE_INIT_PRIORITY): Define.
> * include/std/iostream (__ioinit): Define only if init_priority
> attribute isn't usable.
> * src/c++98/ios_init.cc (__ioinit): Define here instead if
> the init_priority is usable.
> * src/c++98/ios_base_init.h: New file.
This (r13-3707-g4e4e3ffd10f53e) broke statically linked programs
using iostreams (affected embedded targets + "native" with
-static). For me it manifests as adding some 100+ fails to my
cris-elf autotester also repeatable using a native Debian 11
x86_64 build running the test-suite with -static like "make
check-gcc-c++ 'RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=unix/-static
old-deja.exp=15071.C'".
I opened PR107701 for it.
brgds, H-P
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-15 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-04 15:05 [PATCH 1/2] c++: correct __has_attribute(init_priority) Patrick Palka
2022-11-04 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] libstdc++: Move stream initialization into compiled library [PR44952] Patrick Palka
2022-11-04 15:24 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-11-04 16:31 ` Patrick Palka
2022-11-04 16:42 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-11-04 16:57 ` Florian Weimer
2022-11-04 17:47 ` Patrick Palka
2022-11-04 18:16 ` Florian Weimer
2022-11-15 16:10 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson [this message]
2022-11-04 15:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] c++: correct __has_attribute(init_priority) Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221115161053.60D072043F@pchp3.se.axis.com \
--to=hp@axis.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ppalka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).