From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com (mail-wm1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::330]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B02C83858CDA; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 05:11:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B02C83858CDA Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id i5-20020a05600c354500b003edd24054e0so12668296wmq.4; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 22:11:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680153100; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ylg/byZIJ40jdvJSNMHXvaVWs3nd2aAC7eOs1patHyA=; b=qAdetNVoYpc9hXe/ex/tckVUy24B8g6JjGeqqieUw3Eqaz8cqN/l+WIlpNmixkmM1Y PZTKdiHLkDs4+S5NcV2vulC6ugLIAE0qKbPL4sJrt5+pNzxLmCwooxQVWJ580m1Qkr56 RSou+PVEObedkPMb4c+sp3OFVZaNJHQSIM4zmFmTcjVtHxPgdCabqVBtl1pYrwKPmsAz 8AHI2WAJbTiyRttzbq2L1Z5O2H3eXr2ccHpOyNEuEs+poWBc8ajx/gO7xyrgylSzeqW6 xLr2fU6v7izk76TNv1EPcCkzuQ4dJF8KLhgX+8havuMqyb+MjSccCVgen3eSIRJqu2cS a1PA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680153100; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ylg/byZIJ40jdvJSNMHXvaVWs3nd2aAC7eOs1patHyA=; b=X/7XJFWhRrcYPLQsGCgE4z9f+O6XyzUzPbkLpnjg5tfrE7fVNctMka6GXiIkyqkNZC shkOh1aKM5VJbU2kswwXZO6OQiSysdEEjkDglbTevHUS4vGyFRDgRq4wErKntUFylre5 DWor08ZiaWJ8KbbB74bfp6voVP1e/JwTzFBrraU0v6HHeW9rCvg2fHPjhbOZhar2tfFp ZTddwRP0kzNPI7399g+ExEaIqZ/umJvcqDwp7r9SoqQRyhVlBu0jWJNLIWZveWWiB9hU aM4MKtKZWqpdRO8lqbBegdjTRULzNl1UGYc/8eaVPwhAa9P0eFAlv1MWeocEvVJ4kIn3 LfyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9eCD6ch8zmlZLPxUo5LqzfCta4XDvMZ6eD0tzojOwYbaEdupcdo J+Aidu8QYS4vOAULIYtyvW87rUOdiSM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350anYBIyZz3tkjDIrAWRXmNp8W1x6mHmqFOaWA3dGSwRCZ1wYh5nBd1zLUFwNjpWDiPGKhpFPg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb8d:0:b0:3ee:6161:7d98 with SMTP id m13-20020a7bcb8d000000b003ee61617d98mr3712247wmi.16.1680153099870; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 22:11:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.0.78] ([109.190.253.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o6-20020a1c7506000000b003ee63fe5203sm4357610wmc.36.2023.03.29.22.11.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Mar 2023 22:11:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <32c3f04d-2196-5c3d-0176-f807b1744720@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 07:11:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Subject: Re: [GSoC] Conflicted Built-in Trait Name To: Ken Matsui , Jonathan Wakely Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <7f83711f-5094-6c6d-822b-966293062afc@inria.fr> Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=c3=a7ois_Dumont?= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_SHORT,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Do not hesitate to dig into library doc. Especially this page: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-8.1.0/libstdc++/manual/manual/test.html You can also find it in your git clone in /libstdc++-v3/doc/html. You'll see also how to run test in different std modes like --std=c++98 to catch the kind of issue reported by Jonathan. Regarding your patches I wonder if it's not too splitted. 1 patch per builtin would sound more logical, at least for an easy one like __is_void. François On 29/03/2023 01:33, Ken Matsui wrote: > Oooh, thank you for your help! > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 4:25 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 at 22:30, Ken Matsui via Libstdc++ >> wrote: >>> Hi François, >>> >>> I tried to use `make check-debug`, but my Makefile does not include >>> the target. Could you please tell me how you generated your Makefile? >> It's a target in the libstdc++ makefile, so you need to run it from >> the $target/libstdc++-v3 directory. >>