* Status of P0645 (std::format) in libstdc++
@ 2021-05-15 10:12 Spencer Collyer
2021-05-15 13:27 ` Jonathan Wakely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Spencer Collyer @ 2021-05-15 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libstdc++
Firstly, I hope it is OK to ask questions like the following on this list.
I'm wondering what the status of P0645 in libstdc++ is at the moment? This is the proposal that introduces the std::format text formatting library in C++20.
I've checked the page https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#status.iso.2020. The line for that proposal just mentions the SD 6 feature test macro check to see if it is supported. Is it being worked on at present?
Regards,
Spencer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of P0645 (std::format) in libstdc++
2021-05-15 10:12 Status of P0645 (std::format) in libstdc++ Spencer Collyer
@ 2021-05-15 13:27 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-05-16 2:28 ` Ed Smith-Rowland
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2021-05-15 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Spencer Collyer; +Cc: libstdc++
On Sat, 15 May 2021, 12:10 Spencer Collyer, <spencer@spencercollyer.plus.com>
wrote:
> Firstly, I hope it is OK to ask questions like the following on this list.
>
Yes, totally fine!
> I'm wondering what the status of P0645 in libstdc++ is at the moment? This
> is the proposal that introduces the std::format text formatting library in
> C++20.
>
> I've checked the page
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#status.iso.2020.
> The line for that proposal just mentions the SD 6 feature test macro check
> to see if it is supported. Is it being worked on at present?
>
No, not that I'm aware of.
For now, the best option is to use the fmt library from GitHub.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of P0645 (std::format) in libstdc++
2021-05-15 13:27 ` Jonathan Wakely
@ 2021-05-16 2:28 ` Ed Smith-Rowland
2021-05-16 7:24 ` Jonathan Wakely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ed Smith-Rowland @ 2021-05-16 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Wakely, Spencer Collyer; +Cc: libstdc++
On 5/15/21 9:27 AM, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote:
> On Sat, 15 May 2021, 12:10 Spencer Collyer, <spencer@spencercollyer.plus.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Firstly, I hope it is OK to ask questions like the following on this list.
>>
> Yes, totally fine!
>
>
>
>> I'm wondering what the status of P0645 in libstdc++ is at the moment? This
>> is the proposal that introduces the std::format text formatting library in
>> C++20.
>>
>> I've checked the page
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#status.iso.2020.
>> The line for that proposal just mentions the SD 6 feature test macro check
>> to see if it is supported. Is it being worked on at present?
>>
>
> No, not that I'm aware of.
>
> For now, the best option is to use the fmt library from GitHub.
I was looking into this (not that I have time) and decided that grabbing
fmt is the best way forward for libstdc++ if the licensing could work.
Ed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of P0645 (std::format) in libstdc++
2021-05-16 2:28 ` Ed Smith-Rowland
@ 2021-05-16 7:24 ` Jonathan Wakely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2021-05-16 7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ed Smith-Rowland; +Cc: Spencer Collyer, libstdc++
On Sun, 16 May 2021, 03:29 Ed Smith-Rowland, <3dw4rd@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 5/15/21 9:27 AM, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 May 2021, 12:10 Spencer Collyer, <
> spencer@spencercollyer.plus.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Firstly, I hope it is OK to ask questions like the following on this
> list.
> >>
> > Yes, totally fine!
> >
> >
> >
> >> I'm wondering what the status of P0645 in libstdc++ is at the moment?
> This
> >> is the proposal that introduces the std::format text formatting library
> in
> >> C++20.
> >>
> >> I've checked the page
> >>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#status.iso.2020
> .
> >> The line for that proposal just mentions the SD 6 feature test macro
> check
> >> to see if it is supported. Is it being worked on at present?
> >>
> >
> > No, not that I'm aware of.
> >
> > For now, the best option is to use the fmt library from GitHub.
>
> I was looking into this (not that I have time) and decided that grabbing
> fmt is the best way forward for libstdc++ if the licensing could work.
>
Maybe, although an independent re-implementation of the spec has big
advantages for the quality of the spec.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-16 7:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-15 10:12 Status of P0645 (std::format) in libstdc++ Spencer Collyer
2021-05-15 13:27 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-05-16 2:28 ` Ed Smith-Rowland
2021-05-16 7:24 ` Jonathan Wakely
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).