From: "François Dumont" <frs.dumont@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [committed] libstdc++: Specialize std::pointer_traits<__normal_iterator<I,C>>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 19:27:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57b54891-59ba-394d-3d53-218f5061b8ef@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACb0b4mBT=C_xZmFstH+m+jxdDyGEUcE6y=X4PNZAS5+Q2KA-Q@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1695 bytes --]
I would like to propose this alternative approach.
In this patch I make __normal_iterator and random iterator
_Safe_iterator compatible for pointer_traits primary template.
Regarding pointer_traits I wonder if it shouldn't check for the
to_pointer method availability and use per default: return {
std::addressof(__e) }; otherwise. This way we wouldn't have to provide a
pointer_to method on __normal_iterator.
François
On 02/10/21 12:29 am, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 21:27, François Dumont via Libstdc++
> <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>> Here is the _Safe_iterator one.
>>
>> Doing so I noticed that pointer_traits rebind for __normal_iterator was
>> wrong and added tests on it.
> Oops, thanks!
>
>> For _Safe_iterator maybe I should specialize only when instantiated with
>> __normal_iterator ? Or maybe limit to random_access_iterator_tag ?
> Yes, I think that's a good idea, maybe only for __normal_iterator<T*,
> C>. I think that should cover all the cases we actually need to
> support.
>
> And could you change the existing pointer_traits<__normal_iterator<I,
> C>> partial specialization to only be valid for
> __normal_iterator<T*,C> as well? i.e. only for __normal_iterator that
> wraps a pointer (which is true for string::iterator, vector::iterator
> etc.)
>
>> Whatever the pointer_to implementation is problematic, we can only
>> produce singular iterator as I did ifor now.
> Hmm, yes. I think that's OK, because I don't think anybody is actually
> going to use that function. What matters is that it works with
> std::__to_address for C++17 mode, and that doesn't depend on
> pointer_to, so it's OK if it doesn't work usefully.
>
> Thanks!
>
[-- Attachment #2: ptr_traits.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5441 bytes --]
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_iterator.h b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_iterator.h
index 8afd6756613..594d4d5b65f 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_iterator.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_iterator.h
@@ -1017,6 +1017,13 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
template<typename _Iterator, typename _Container>
class __normal_iterator
{
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+ using __ite_ptr_traits = std::pointer_traits<_Iterator>;
+
+ template<typename _Tp>
+ using __ite_rebind = typename __ite_ptr_traits::template rebind<_Tp>;
+#endif
+
protected:
_Iterator _M_current;
@@ -1036,6 +1043,17 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
typedef typename __traits_type::reference reference;
typedef typename __traits_type::pointer pointer;
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+ using element_type = typename __ite_ptr_traits::element_type;
+
+ template<typename _Up>
+ using rebind = __normal_iterator<__ite_rebind<_Up>, _Container>;
+
+ static __normal_iterator
+ pointer_to(element_type& __e)
+ { return { __ite_ptr_traits::pointer_to(__e) }; }
+#endif
+
#if __cplusplus > 201703L && __cpp_lib_concepts
using iterator_concept = std::__detail::__iter_concept<_Iterator>;
#endif
@@ -1311,34 +1329,6 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
{ return __it.base(); }
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
-
- // Need to specialize pointer_traits because the primary template will
- // deduce element_type of __normal_iterator<T*, C> as T* rather than T.
- template<typename _Iterator, typename _Container>
- struct pointer_traits<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<_Iterator, _Container>>
- {
- private:
- using _Base = pointer_traits<_Iterator>;
-
- public:
- using element_type = typename _Base::element_type;
- using pointer = __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<_Iterator, _Container>;
- using difference_type = typename _Base::difference_type;
-
- template<typename _Tp>
- using rebind = __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<_Tp, _Container>;
-
- static pointer
- pointer_to(element_type& __e) noexcept
- { return pointer(_Base::pointer_to(__e)); }
-
-#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
- static element_type*
- to_address(pointer __p) noexcept
- { return __p.base(); }
-#endif
- };
-
/**
* @addtogroup iterators
* @{
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_iterator.h b/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_iterator.h
index 5584d06de5a..b175c9e4a31 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_iterator.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_iterator.h
@@ -653,6 +653,13 @@ namespace __gnu_debug
: public _Safe_iterator<_Iterator, _Sequence,
std::bidirectional_iterator_tag>
{
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+ using __ite_ptr_traits = std::pointer_traits<_Iterator>;
+
+ template<typename _Tp>
+ using __ite_rebind = typename __ite_ptr_traits::template rebind<_Tp>;
+#endif
+
typedef _Safe_iterator<_Iterator, _Sequence,
std::bidirectional_iterator_tag> _Safe_base;
typedef typename _Safe_base::_OtherIterator _OtherIterator;
@@ -672,6 +679,19 @@ namespace __gnu_debug
typedef typename _Safe_base::difference_type difference_type;
typedef typename _Safe_base::reference reference;
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+ using element_type = typename __ite_ptr_traits::element_type;
+
+ template<typename _Up>
+ using rebind = _Safe_iterator<__ite_rebind<_Up>, _Sequence,
+ std::random_access_iterator_tag>;
+
+ static _Safe_iterator
+ pointer_to(element_type& __e)
+ { return { __ite_ptr_traits::pointer_to(__e), nullptr }; }
+#endif
+
/// @post the iterator is singular and unattached
_Safe_iterator() _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT { }
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/pointer_traits/rebind.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/pointer_traits/rebind.cc
index 159ea8f5294..b78e974d777 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/pointer_traits/rebind.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/pointer_traits/rebind.cc
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
#include <memory>
+#include <vector>
using std::is_same;
@@ -66,3 +67,13 @@ template<typename T, int = 0>
};
// PR libstdc++/72793 specialization of pointer_traits is still well-formed:
std::pointer_traits<CannotRebind<int>>::element_type e;
+
+static_assert(is_same<typename std::pointer_traits<
+ Rebind<typename std::vector<int>::iterator, long>>::element_type,
+ long>::value,
+ "iterator rebind");
+
+static_assert(is_same<typename std::pointer_traits<
+ Rebind<typename std::vector<int>::const_iterator, long>>::element_type,
+ long>::value,
+ "const_iterator rebind");
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/24_iterators/normal_iterator/to_address.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/24_iterators/normal_iterator/to_address.cc
index 510d627435f..433c803beb1 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/24_iterators/normal_iterator/to_address.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/24_iterators/normal_iterator/to_address.cc
@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
// { dg-do compile { target { c++11 } } }
#include <string>
+#include <vector>
#include <memory>
char* p = std::__to_address(std::string("1").begin());
const char* q = std::__to_address(std::string("2").cbegin());
+int* r = std::__to_address(std::vector<int>(1, 1).begin());
+const int* s = std::__to_address(std::vector<int>(1, 1).cbegin());
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-02 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-28 19:25 Jonathan Wakely
2021-09-30 20:24 ` François Dumont
2021-10-01 22:29 ` [committed] libstdc++: Specialize std::pointer_traits<__normal_iterator<I, C>> Jonathan Wakely
2021-10-02 13:08 ` [committed] libstdc++: Specialize std::pointer_traits<__normal_iterator<I,C>> François Dumont
2021-10-02 20:28 ` [committed] libstdc++: Specialize std::pointer_traits<__normal_iterator<I, C>> Jonathan Wakely
2021-10-02 17:27 ` François Dumont [this message]
2021-10-02 20:24 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-10-04 20:05 ` [committed] libstdc++: Specialize std::pointer_traits<__normal_iterator<I,C>> François Dumont
2021-10-04 20:26 ` François Dumont
2021-10-04 20:30 ` [committed] libstdc++: Specialize std::pointer_traits<__normal_iterator<I, C>> Jonathan Wakely
2021-10-06 17:18 ` [committed] libstdc++: Specialize std::pointer_traits<__normal_iterator<I,C>> François Dumont
2021-10-06 17:25 ` François Dumont
2021-12-14 6:53 ` François Dumont
2021-12-14 13:12 ` [committed] libstdc++: Specialize std::pointer_traits<__normal_iterator<I, C>> Jonathan Wakely
2021-12-15 21:16 ` [committed] libstdc++: Specialize std::pointer_traits<__normal_iterator<I,C>> François Dumont
2021-12-15 21:21 ` [committed] libstdc++: Specialize std::pointer_traits<__normal_iterator<I, C>> Jonathan Wakely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57b54891-59ba-394d-3d53-218f5061b8ef@gmail.com \
--to=frs.dumont@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).