From: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [committed] libstdc++: Implement LWG 2762 for std::unique_ptr::operator*
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:53:55 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82f170be-4968-cae2-f775-c863096b5f@idea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YNSEKtekP+UTmfqZ@redhat.com>
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote:
> The LWG issue proposes to add a conditional noexcept-specifier to
> std::unique_ptr's dereference operator. The issue is currently in
> Tentatively Ready status, but even if it isn't voted into the draft, we
> can do it as a conforming extensions. This commit also adds a similar
> noexcept-specifier to operator[] for the unique_ptr<T[], D> partial
> specialization.
The conditional noexcept added to unique_ptr<T[]>::operator[] seems to break
the case where T is complete only after the fact:
struct T;
extern std::unique_ptr<T[]> p;
auto& t = p[1];
struct T { };
/include/c++/12.0.0/bits/unique_ptr.h: In instantiation of ‘typename std::add_lvalue_reference<_Tp>::type std::unique_ptr<_Tp [], _Dp>::operator[](std::size_t) co
nst [with _Tp = A; _Dp = std::default_delete<A []>; typename std::add_lvalue_reference<_Tp>::type = A&; std::size_t = long unsigned int]’:
testcase.cc:5:14: required from here
/include/c++/12.0.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:658:48: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘struct A’
658 | noexcept(noexcept(std::declval<pointer>()[std::declval<size_t&>()]))
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
testcase.cc:3:8: note: forward declaration of ‘struct A’
3 | struct A;
| ^
>
> Also ensure that all dereference operators for shared_ptr are noexcept,
> and adds tests for the std::optional accessors modified by the issue,
> which were already noexcept in our implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> * include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h (__shared_ptr_access::operator[]):
> Add noexcept.
> * include/bits/unique_ptr.h (unique_ptr::operator*): Add
> conditional noexcept as per LWG 2762.
> * testsuite/20_util/shared_ptr/observers/array.cc: Check that
> dereferencing cannot throw.
> * testsuite/20_util/shared_ptr/observers/get.cc: Likewise.
> * testsuite/20_util/optional/observers/lwg2762.cc: New test.
> * testsuite/20_util/unique_ptr/lwg2762.cc: New test.
>
> Tested powerpc64le-linux. Committed to trunk.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-24 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-24 13:10 Jonathan Wakely
2021-06-24 18:53 ` Patrick Palka [this message]
2021-06-24 19:29 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-06-24 21:10 ` Tim Song
2021-06-28 14:19 ` Jonathan Wakely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82f170be-4968-cae2-f775-c863096b5f@idea \
--to=ppalka@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).