From: Vladimir V <vv.os.swe@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Problem building libstdc++ for the avr target
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 22:37:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+=iAioVbpTsPAz+1aoBpDy86_hBkkrfa8dLkDGmTn3eJxMbaQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210325182709.GU3008@redhat.com>
Thank you for the quick reply.
I am wondering if the freestanding libstdc++ requires that only
freestanding subset of the underlying libc is used?
avr-libc has stdlib.h with malloc declaration but it is not 'visible' in
this code. I was thinking that maybe something like that
would work (works in my case):
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/c_global/cstdlib
b/libstdc++-v3/include/c_global/cstdlib
index 47b954cf2..f04fd08de 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/c_global/cstdlib
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/c_global/cstdlib
@@ -43,7 +43,8 @@
#ifndef _GLIBCXX_CSTDLIB
#define _GLIBCXX_CSTDLIB 1
-#if !_GLIBCXX_HOSTED
+#if !_GLIBCXX_HOSTED && !_GLIBCXX_HAVE_STDLIB_H
+
// The C standard does not require a freestanding implementation to
// provide <stdlib.h>. However, the C++ standard does still require
// <cstdlib> -- but only the functionality mentioned in
It includes the stdlib.h from target libc if it is present.
чт, 25 мар. 2021 г. в 19:27, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>:
> On 25/03/21 12:36 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >On 25/03/21 10:27 +0100, Vladimir V wrote:
> >>Hello.
> >>
> >>Recently I tried the 'freestanding' build of the libstdc++ for the avr to
> >>verify that my fixes were sufficient for it as well.
> >>Unfortunately, I encountered the following error:
> >>../../../../libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/new_opa.cc: In function 'void*
> >>__gnu_cxx::aligned_alloc(std::size_t, std::size_t)':
> >>../../../../libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/new_opa.cc:97:28: error: 'malloc' was
> >>not declared in this scope
> >> 97 | void* const malloc_ptr = malloc(sz + al);
> >>
> >>My investigation showed that in the chain of includes the stdlib.h of the
> >>avr-libc is not present.
> >>It looks like includes are resolved in the following way (here are the
> >>original paths as they are linked from out folders during build):
> >>new_opa.cc -> libstdc++-v3/include/c_compatibility/stdlib.h ->
> >>libstdc++-v3/include/c_global/cstdlib
> >>In cstdlib, for non-hosted builds stdlib.h is not included.
> >>
> >>This problem is not present if the non-hosted build is done with
> >>'with-newlib' flag instead of 'with-avrlibc' (common workaround as the
> >>avrlibc build was fixed only recently).
> >>Might it be that some include order depends on the target libc? Or maybe
> >>some implicit conditions are involved?
> >>
> >>Could you please support me with this issue?
> >
> >I think this is needed:
> >
> >--- a/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/new_opa.cc
> >+++ b/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/new_opa.cc
> >@@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ extern "C"
> > void *posix_memalign(void **, size_t alignment, size_t size);
> > # elif _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MEMALIGN
> > void *memalign(size_t alignment, size_t size);
> >+#else
> >+ // A freestanding C runtime may not provide "malloc" -- but there is no
> >+ // other reasonable way to implement "operator new".
> >+ void *malloc (std::size_t); with GCC 7.5
>
> Oops, there was a stray "with GCC 7.5" that got into my clipboard
> there!
>
> I've pushed the attached patch, please test and confirm if it fixes
> your problem.
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-25 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-07 17:32 Vladimir V
2020-12-07 20:30 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-12-07 20:32 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-12-09 0:28 ` Vladimir V
2020-12-09 12:32 ` Vladimir V
2020-12-09 12:49 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-12-09 17:01 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-12-09 23:00 ` Vladimir V
2020-12-10 17:39 ` Vladimir V
2020-12-10 20:15 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-12-10 20:31 ` Vladimir V
2020-12-15 11:48 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-12-16 7:33 ` Vladimir V
2020-12-07 20:41 ` Keith Packard
2020-12-07 21:06 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-01-04 11:28 ` Vladimir V
2021-01-08 18:21 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-01-22 14:46 ` Vladimir V
2021-02-07 13:55 ` Vladimir V
2021-02-07 18:22 ` Vladimir V
2021-02-07 18:23 ` Keith Packard
2021-02-07 22:33 ` Vladimir V
2021-02-07 23:06 ` Keith Packard
2021-02-08 12:58 ` Vladimir V
2021-02-08 17:38 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-02-08 17:45 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-02-08 17:47 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-02-08 22:25 ` Vladimir V
2021-02-09 10:47 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-02-09 10:54 ` Vladimir V
2021-03-25 9:27 ` Vladimir V
2021-03-25 12:36 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-03-25 18:27 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-03-25 21:37 ` Vladimir V [this message]
2021-03-25 23:02 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-03-26 8:25 ` Vladimir V
2020-12-07 21:51 ` Vladimir V
2020-12-07 23:00 ` Keith Packard
2020-12-08 8:12 ` Vladimir V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+=iAioVbpTsPAz+1aoBpDy86_hBkkrfa8dLkDGmTn3eJxMbaQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=vv.os.swe@gmail.com \
--cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).