From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 336E43858D3C for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:01:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 336E43858D3C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1668441668; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SlrVsoLdnDjPC3jXEjSqLIz/lmqMJAlsEr90zE+8rTU=; b=fUIzfMNte5tRKzw4AEst+N2nklwRZpi/Qp5EZj/O+b17KJhccMEH7xBx6Cfosb6kSMWdNp 9wygC/xu3fPj5xG0m/gV6t9oT+l3zd96jom+JlAYoKUSd+BwZ47uACb7g2UzpkVBgjyWXz JdQUx5FdG2oV9qJP/Z0i8qiMeQSpcRM= Received: from mail-ej1-f71.google.com (mail-ej1-f71.google.com [209.85.218.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-553-CdJqspWfMfe58q-lMbKTXQ-1; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:01:06 -0500 X-MC-Unique: CdJqspWfMfe58q-lMbKTXQ-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f71.google.com with SMTP id qw20-20020a1709066a1400b007af13652c92so880461ejc.20 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:01:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SlrVsoLdnDjPC3jXEjSqLIz/lmqMJAlsEr90zE+8rTU=; b=HkpgqB4KqI+/nibAmZ24YX70rBvSirccEF1MOtnihAgi758ZzEhi9U/GvGvq1jJNU4 1L4kIKZwMS1C9gt1959XR0q2A8zepm1f7/jHnD7TsYuZOPRJBhlpLP7ByF5nnSpe7YJs 1MAWJL479NcEG/oWEF16QlChIqUnvo78rd8N6mkz5GOmCuRqPTZSI6Doyv2FOWIpa9AH lZi4JQAa+L9ey0Nm5dpl0MIyPkhVxeS9GRMbAp374fH8b2bo+spyWTvBVENgvDL46LGl IM5CPKuW+sJvOLbftjo20+tKvJbmqLWlVnYq0JaTww1h4lsJ3WSFuVsKpFniymaqg93M JiBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnTwqGREr+CdwC4u3DGm+LAxQf0S20N9y8WU3scjN2NEFSHERAT oHVTVbT2g/EwD5VB1PEifpJrVAUD4/vWck3qShHcfhkfTaPR5vEq6QiYThBRx73ekycNbQwWiFO 7c/W399gwrxNovjcFdS/3mDnu8A/k7wI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2b26:b0:7ae:c460:c65f with SMTP id gc38-20020a1709072b2600b007aec460c65fmr10535411ejc.226.1668441665281; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:01:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4qk7dy40jt+PY2jf2bX5+QB5ZB3AnaJWfvUk7+nQVVBwMEUFddPypHI+2hPF2/TJOdUMcseOU7REShUgoRvMY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2b26:b0:7ae:c460:c65f with SMTP id gc38-20020a1709072b2600b007aec460c65fmr10535369ejc.226.1668441664642; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:01:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221113180527.2907744-1-arsen@aarsen.me> <86wn7xvfj1.fsf@aarsen.me> <86sfilv88p.fsf@aarsen.me> In-Reply-To: <86sfilv88p.fsf@aarsen.me> From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:00:53 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix python/ not making install directories To: =?UTF-8?Q?Arsen_Arsenovi=C4=87?= Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 at 15:58, Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87 wrote: > > > Jonathan Wakely writes: > >> It's the first thing the recipe does: > >> > >> install-data-local: gdb.py > >> @$(mkdir_p) $(DESTDIR)$(toolexeclibdir) > >> > >> That's why I'm suggesting to do the same thing for the debug dir. > > > > This presumably means it has the problems that mkinstalldirs is > > supposed to solve, but is that only relevant for Solaris 8, i.e. not > > relevant? > > Ah, sorry. I didn't notice that it did that at the top. Yes, mkdir -p > is at least as good then. > I've pushed it to trunk now, thanks for finding the problem.