From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6917A3858038 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 16:31:10 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6917A3858038 Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-593-hlZ_e20jMyK-6p8_fFYZ5w-1; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 12:31:07 -0400 X-MC-Unique: hlZ_e20jMyK-6p8_fFYZ5w-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id j19-20020a1c2313000000b002e7012b83e9so1139715wmj.2 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:31:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fO7Dk3Kr9CUVrwoy9J0pzAdJAr5QyE6kq2V+RikSpqU=; b=VF0mI7dLCrGgavy/0nPN2EoX8zBTCOPFK8Z2Kd1bVBllhYFs4kEeXEUfg1mFHWvNs8 L0UXW+qFad67Na3X8bQzC6kS1GTDXSE2SaoKueNdIwMajdJ/5dYfHyBCCuSwuuF5n1Px S3UZju6RrpZYcnHH2kddm+kipwzF9o2E93gYgTVeKnRp1gJL35pFvyatFoh5A4fcM4zm pZJH7HbxMfX9AQR1Z/R7jgmzGRfQcEjFgv1ZsbKdoqsYpG2JcYW4NSmBiHVy0wAC+liV x9LD3uR6WQDGQlR4d2syyyX8QmeBXACQ2oeImAN04gXOt0NCly6pLW1h1YYgkuBDBZG/ 34sQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533oR6yDeVXnq5R2FsAmAOBK/GO+9cAwj/8odWfS7tB5rEz4ZQcU zPTgIrxdOVgRk/Lftlmo/1dSIUX6fO3Zxj82mHiTrhWrGnrsSkYe1vKy9Ura0Hz18do6eedRBT8 orZBVccsOBf5FZl9niwZgRP/Oe2EugKs= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:23d6:: with SMTP id j205mr9614896wmj.185.1629304266405; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:31:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxjM1Z+RYFZF9P2I6gpyIOyFu3Z264RkypZicWQ/EIoKkZWj93eS+M6/I5wTW5ZASN7iUxSgmX5aWwQdrs6tE= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:23d6:: with SMTP id j205mr9614873wmj.185.1629304266093; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:31:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2880466.YWZaH7Zrci@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 17:30:55 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libstdc++: improve documentation for bits/stl_function.h [PR51539] To: =?UTF-8?Q?Krzysztof_=C5=BBelechowski?= Cc: gcc Patches , "libstdc++" X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libstdc++ mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 16:31:20 -0000 On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 at 13:49, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 21:39, Krzysztof =C5=BBelechowski wrote: > > - /// One of the @link memory_adaptors adaptors for member > > "memory_adaptors" here is a bad name (see > which introduced it) but we can just > change it to ptrmem_adaptors, rather than change it to > pointer_adaptors. If we did want to change it, we'd want to get rid of > the @defgroup for memory_adaptors, not just leave it hanging around > doing nothing. I've pushed a change to rename that group, you'll need to rebase your patch= .