Re: [PATCH] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ABI break in _Hash_node_value_base since GCC 11 [PR 111050]

[Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>]

On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 18:25, François Dumont <frs.dumont@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 28/09/2023 18:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 05:44, François Dumont <frs.dumont@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Still no chance to get feedback from TC ? Maybe I can commit the below
> >> then ?
> > I've heard back from Tim now. Please use "Tim Song
> > <t.canens.cpp@gmail.com>" as the author.
> >
> > You can change the commit again using git commit --amend --author "Tim
> > Song <t.canens.cpp@gmail.com>"
>
> Sure :-)
>
> >
> > OK for trunk with that change - thanks for waiting.
>
> Committed to trunk, let me know for backports.

Please wait a few days in case of problems on the trunk (although I
don't expect any) and then OK for 11/12/13 too - thanks!


>
> >> AFAICS on gcc mailing list several gcc releases were done recently, too
> >> late.
> > There have been no releases this month, so the delay hasn't caused any problems.
>
> I was confused by emails like this one:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-September/242429.html
>
> I just subscribed to gcc mailing list, I had no idea there were regular
> snapshots like this.
>