From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CF823858C20 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:16:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 4CF823858C20 Received: from mail-yb1-f199.google.com (mail-yb1-f199.google.com [209.85.219.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-558-i5amEKa7OpWsLtNkR6yAMQ-1; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 07:16:55 -0500 X-MC-Unique: i5amEKa7OpWsLtNkR6yAMQ-1 Received: by mail-yb1-f199.google.com with SMTP id 190-20020a2505c7000000b00629283fec72so4257154ybf.5 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 04:16:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wOU9powdg0xfOgCvsvZQWTIQEpJ8eKpyekoCBdzgyVo=; b=4Ti+gOMAeaPVRvHtkxhe+gro4pkMQpF332lwoA7cu9eZqSpUzd0v4PqT8GQINAwwo5 p4TjqiCIlHwNMQufgQEfQoqO80MEsZ5TaY3/vKUnYlCFvrwPtYQzlnVlTkuHBcFbx3Ij oYD19j10sQWCyJ6+JgK5xOR4XbYD5m2tKm4DTGhI6xSZQfjOte4Ti1OMD8DolzxdnHPs Qst2FUz0TiyU84CCIxEEGaNuyBLHcEM4KzsthxqGO40vKe7SfqHBuHJ8bUj/tuoFsEZt gPfHPomCADABtuQb/0iiOeQPB++n3BFLmBkaYfqTuwzI9OWksID6yTe/GEKhvgnjiDVe Qjsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533JSh+tndjLmXATiZhcJF145a/JhQ1Ah9OhgG/5XqdO766fh2PU m1QTZ/Ly8OdPMH7q71wV8ZXJdZ6huy0+WG168dmx36HYC89q6Y3YEmQ5N4iraOMMRH3MI0VPOwg XyHysgqPwUhpwzye5/OHpArVuZKNzkcM= X-Received: by 2002:a81:6a86:0:b0:2dc:da43:7aca with SMTP id f128-20020a816a86000000b002dcda437acamr3470542ywc.473.1646914615357; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 04:16:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUoEmBjN/K4wKf+fVLJZXjkbfLk90/xHWSGZYFbFkH9u0N0gSnMP9YOGTV0dzp1S9wvwf8Vf4joVyJ3jC4aIA= X-Received: by 2002:a81:6a86:0:b0:2dc:da43:7aca with SMTP id f128-20020a816a86000000b002dcda437acamr3470531ywc.473.1646914615134; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 04:16:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220310115116.1716777-1-jwakely@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20220310115116.1716777-1-jwakely@redhat.com> From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:16:44 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [committed] libstdc++: Support VAX floats in std::strong_order To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: "libstdc++" , gcc Patches X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libstdc++ mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:16:58 -0000 On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 at 11:53, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote: > > Tested x86_64-linux, and basic soundness check on vax-dec-netbsdelf. But apparently not enough of a soundness check, because isnan(__builtin_nan("")) is true for VAX, so GCC seems to have a NaN pattern, despite what I read online about the format. Fix on the way ...