From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F34E33858C53 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 10:44:27 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org F34E33858C53 Received: from mail-yw1-f197.google.com (mail-yw1-f197.google.com [209.85.128.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-372-fLkwdjmqOqWeU8AVOwIhSw-1; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 06:44:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: fLkwdjmqOqWeU8AVOwIhSw-1 Received: by mail-yw1-f197.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-2ec0490dc1bso39726567b3.5 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 03:44:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1ZoFP02UXzHzM01UBtp3BMM9VwwjwDSLfqWvaJ5aaWU=; b=LV+QoVmu6dYl7Dyqsb4nXH41M5dLVQnh279dWncGZSIXEb5e7P2yO5iJz3wCOQiaUb C3rUqm02ZIzV8RosJlFRPCE4hLoEvi4PwqYbgp49YALZesioqi4lMz8r2RT6LGy7/L0G Qsc8bJAf22kAqiqY9u6LLKxGddGtBJr/zydRlnV/lNeuXw+lQ3CbZfD2+oaWGaUyTgIO mvfdNhBpFslUMIZjEyXcNle3DIEigGKxafwWrrEKNf9aDvB0tWSSd4woFqAI+EJMsPiR fbxN/hKaCBjEfT1IHt2vKO5fV2aYnK7ct8j85BeqNbJ3H/gtj1WObPzbo7BUMbUbqVfM 78Ww== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531zoaaED8Rr2JZNxJm6piKqQsBN5sbvAMyFsIMNsgruu2NQMqot RjISx6hQJZyVbLQ9ZF6Fe1Ravbm8AOaN3YCXq6c6ropQ6CBuRVy3DsSkRIFiZKu3WHxGlNVtPfW Vi/3MkI91GNYvdeAgllqR6dZZAkByypo= X-Received: by 2002:a25:546:0:b0:641:bd3:a8b2 with SMTP id 67-20020a250546000000b006410bd3a8b2mr1120906ybf.500.1649933066256; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 03:44:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx6s1DUHcGdTZNC6nW0YrWUcZU+MT7Ac+SrmpzgHzIV3pyTR/zcXQiginsPPfjOM2hD5+SL+I/6xa+u+TeEhO8= X-Received: by 2002:a25:546:0:b0:641:bd3:a8b2 with SMTP id 67-20020a250546000000b006410bd3a8b2mr1120899ybf.500.1649933066077; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 03:44:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220414102911.681186-1-jwakely@redhat.com> <31761r9p-787-282q-30q4-711s21475s66@fhfr.qr> In-Reply-To: <31761r9p-787-282q-30q4-711s21475s66@fhfr.qr> From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 11:44:15 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Update incorrect statement about mainline in docs To: Richard Biener Cc: "libstdc++" , gcc Patches X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libstdc++ mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 10:44:29 -0000 On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the > > docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline. > > > > Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for 11.1 > > and 11.2, but it would still be nice to fix. > > Yes, it's OK. I notice the same problem exists on the GCC 10 branch > but GCC 9 at least mentions GCC 9 once ;) Yes, I fixed it for gcc-9.3.0, but forgot to do it for gcc-10 and gcc-11. I pushed r10-10534 to fix gcc-10 (since that's open for doc changes) and have now pushed r11-9881 as well. Maybe this year I'll remember to do it for gcc-12 after we branch from trunk!