public inbox for libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>,
	gcc Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libstdc++: Add support for POWER9 DARN instruction to std::random_device
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 18:16:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACb0b4ms0Dc3rs-ELt2-1SA+YzWV648GEFmS8FyxxtapCpci7A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <016e938f-d115-7e0d-1d2f-cf9495708e41@linux.ibm.com>

On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 13:20, Bill Schmidt wrote:

>
> On 11/5/21 7:44 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 20:44, Bill Schmidt wrote: For posterity:  This
> was discussed briefly on IRC, and Segher approved with some simplifications
> and a request to implement a fail/retry check. Here's what I have now. No
> more assembler check
> > On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 20:44, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >     For posterity:  This was discussed briefly on IRC, and Segher
> approved with some
> >     simplifications and a request to implement a fail/retry check.
> >
> >
> > Here's what I have now. No more assembler check in configure, and it
> uses the 64-bit __builtin_darn() and truncates it to 32-bit, or retries (up
> to 100 times) if it fails.
> >
> > I'm doing some more testing now.
> >
> Those changes look good from my perspective.  Thanks again for this work!
> (Not a maintainer, blah blah...)
>

I changed the number of retries to 10 and pushed it to trunk.

      reply	other threads:[~2021-11-05 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-19 16:47 [PATCH] " Jonathan Wakely
2021-10-20  9:12 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-10-20 13:00   ` [PATCH v2] " Jonathan Wakely
2021-11-03 15:01     ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-11-03 15:02       ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-11-04 20:44         ` Bill Schmidt
2021-11-05 12:44           ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-11-05 13:20             ` Bill Schmidt
2021-11-05 18:16               ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACb0b4ms0Dc3rs-ELt2-1SA+YzWV648GEFmS8FyxxtapCpci7A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=wschmidt@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).