From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4A4A385780D for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 10:40:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B4A4A385780D Received: from mail-yw1-f198.google.com (mail-yw1-f198.google.com [209.85.128.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-599-840vgcwIMfSE1vk6ksYbog-1; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:40:22 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 840vgcwIMfSE1vk6ksYbog-1 Received: by mail-yw1-f198.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-2e644c76556so142142177b3.15 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 03:40:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mm+YpDntvcrI1VlEW/U5xRqg6VDljVuJJsAWYlqpn/E=; b=bt8+mFXvejdG3GSg9PjotUREijgI06z2u8xHWtG8jZPi3c3LopRDUeTnMc5+Bi/ZY0 8V5fEFLJd5+oyPjHSWH7LrvhIZq6OL05v/Q0DJQUBd3R0JW6DMH+r2XHHRiOjSctlQoK PznVvnH4sN4vjrwkeNKD+62oQBNzjPjUYyNeW7pltgrKCYfbVZ2RJ+rLaI5jtgtkxnFf 9fqCN2cpK8T8Fdv4Obo2Nano/jBLC56vReyz1F/IRyyLuMHjuinCOVWjAJzxnJ4TONsL rvr0MtfVTSpkvN/1p0a3P8IdQ6CwtV+VjTCHj2NdLb30x+l/b0nK0VRZ2kYcz6TqGvUp L6mg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533TVswQV5fvcr+M6Q4VpkQy7s2gYMWHhC7/RSGLAfbi9pR0GMx5 /1UbQfCJnH70Xx6hl/5hK3kQy8UJwxKe/Oil8WiGsBeDTckVkbBp4EfEhm1A/IhTDWs+Ls20wK0 W1uclneGL4cKA+1SCIH2z0DYAa2l3x8c= X-Received: by 2002:a25:3a02:0:b0:641:68ce:1fe9 with SMTP id h2-20020a253a02000000b0064168ce1fe9mr14456446yba.320.1650364821700; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 03:40:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzU8r8F8nSLNeN7cqHtr1UE7BnkYcV2oNOi1w77RSQV9L0OH7JpW12mycl1l43sV6nXHzCTHk7tgwD9L7Y96c0= X-Received: by 2002:a25:3a02:0:b0:641:68ce:1fe9 with SMTP id h2-20020a253a02000000b0064168ce1fe9mr14456431yba.320.1650364821501; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 03:40:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220414102911.681186-1-jwakely@redhat.com> <31761r9p-787-282q-30q4-711s21475s66@fhfr.qr> <39rr4991-5317-7p7s-3n7n-14rp26p1o4o8@fhfr.qr> In-Reply-To: <39rr4991-5317-7p7s-3n7n-14rp26p1o4o8@fhfr.qr> From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 11:40:10 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Update incorrect statement about mainline in docs To: Richard Biener Cc: "libstdc++" , gcc Patches X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libstdc++ mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 10:40:25 -0000 On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 08:01, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:55, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the > > > > > > docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline. > > > > > > > > > > > > Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for 11.1 > > > > > > and 11.2, but it would still be nice to fix. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it's OK. I notice the same problem exists on the GCC 10 branch > > > > > but GCC 9 at least mentions GCC 9 once ;) > > > > > > > > Yes, I fixed it for gcc-9.3.0, but forgot to do it for gcc-10 and gcc-11. > > > > > > > > I pushed r10-10534 to fix gcc-10 (since that's open for doc changes) > > > > and have now pushed r11-9881 > > > > as well. > > > > > > > > Maybe this year I'll remember to do it for gcc-12 after we branch from trunk! > > > > > > Add an entry to branching.html! > > > > Like this? OK for wwwdocs? > > Maybe > > "Notify libstdc++ maintainers to update ..." > > ? > > OK with that change. Yes, that's better. Pushed with that change, thanks.