From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: "François Dumont" <frs.dumont@gmail.com>
Cc: "libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][_GLIBCXX_INLINE_VERSION] Fix <format> friend declarations
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 17:47:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACb0b4nzK_F9nHRNj4eAHaXffWSNsx0L=TD3xktdmKv0aHebYg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ffce06a5-59a8-56fd-b39e-a2bd38c609a3@gmail.com>
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 18:35, François Dumont via Libstdc++
<libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> The few tests that are failing in versioned namespace mode are due to
> those friend declarations.
>
> This is a fix proposal even if I considered 2 other options:
>
> 1. Make __format::_Arg_store a struct and so do not bother with friend
> declarations.
>
> 2. Consider it as a compiler bug and do nothing. In this case I think we
> might still need this patch to avoid a non-working format library in
> versioned namespace mode in gcc 14 if compiler bug is not fixed.
It definitely is a compiler bug, this is PR c++/59256.
Please add a comment to the new macro definition, so we remember to
remove it when it's not needed:
#if _GLIBCXX_INLINE_VERSION
// Needed because of PR c++/59526
# define _GLIBCXX_STD_V std::__8
#else
# define _GLIBCXX_STD_V std
#endif
OK with that change, thanks.
>
> I can also define _GLIBCXX_STD_V at <format> level to limit impact.
>
> libstdc++: [_GLIBCXX_INLINE_VERSION] Fix <format> friend declarations
>
> GCC do not consider the inline namespace in friend declarations. We
> need
> to explicit this namespace.
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> * include/bits/c++config (_GLIBCXX_STD_V): New macro giving
> current
> std namespace with optionally the version namespace.
> * include/std/format (std::__format::_Arg_store): Use
> latter on friend
> declarations.
>
> Tested under versioned mode.
>
> Ok to commit ?
>
> François
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-12 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-23 17:35 François Dumont
2023-09-07 16:59 ` François Dumont
2023-09-12 16:47 ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
2023-09-12 17:04 ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-09-13 20:47 ` François Dumont
2023-09-13 20:50 ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-01-11 13:53 ` Jonathan Wakely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACb0b4nzK_F9nHRNj4eAHaXffWSNsx0L=TD3xktdmKv0aHebYg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=frs.dumont@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).