From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 95816 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2017 15:35:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libstdc++-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libstdc++-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 95782 invoked by uid 89); 27 Mar 2017 15:35:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*F:D*hr, Hx-languages-length:628, H*r:10.25.19 X-HELO: mail.fer.hr Received: from mail5.fer.hr (HELO mail.fer.hr) (161.53.72.235) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:35:36 +0000 Received: from POSTAR.fer.hr (2001:b68:16:250::72:237) by MAIL5.fer.hr (2001:b68:16:250::72:235) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:35:31 +0200 Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com (209.85.215.51) by POSTAR.fer.hr (161.53.72.237) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:35:31 +0200 Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id z15so24385325lfd.1 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 08:35:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1Yb3bPzjzyPpDL6iq6Y5rVWmVXK8D0bfjKLakY8yoKaBDNWsQ556StKRrdfZOKdbX2edX9X4lN5ChL6Q== X-Received: by 10.25.20.202 with SMTP id 71mr12290464lfu.102.1490628930621; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 08:35:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.19.69 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 08:34:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <308301db772b4f7c95404d69db52baff@MAIL.fer.hr> <4c6aef27483e44dc9aa409dace8490c8@MAIL.fer.hr> From: =?UTF-8?B?SnVyYWogT3LFoXVsacSH?= Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:35:00 -0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Smart pointer pretty printers To: Jonathan Wakely CC: "libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg00106.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > I think we're probably too close to the gcc7 release to make this > change now, sorry. No problem, I think it's most important that it entered the pipeline, since it's been completely dead for 4 years :-) Just a reminder, I added this only for those smart pointers that I needed at the moment - the unique and shared pointer, and for the vector iterator. When you (or someone else) will be doing a review of the patch, let me know if you think this should be expanded for other iterators as well. Thanks, Juraj