public inbox for libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* What is the lowest version of glibc I can use to build gcc 4.8.3 and libstdc++?
@ 2023-10-05  2:52 조안나
  2023-10-05  6:53 ` Jonathan Wakely
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: 조안나 @ 2023-10-05  2:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: libstdc++

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1011 bytes --]

Situation:
I am attempting to migrate legacy C programs to C++11
For use in older distributions, I static link libstdc++ through the
-static-libstdc++ option
C++11 is supported after version 4.8.3 of gcc, So I built it on CentOS7
where gcc 4.8.5 installed.

Result showed a dependence on glibc and was only available in distributions
with glibc14 and later versions installed.
The required version felt a little high because many customers use old
distribution.
I came up with the idea of building libstdc++ myself using a lower version
of glibc to reduce dependency.

First I tried using glibc 2.5 for gcc 4.8.3
Same, I built it on CentOS7 where gcc 4.8.5 and glibc 2.17 installed.
But failed with the error below:
configure: error: unsupported system, cannot find sizeof (omp_lock_t)

I think I lowered the glibc too much, but I couldn't find a document about
compatibility between gcc or libstdc++ and glibc.
What is the lowest version of glibc I can use to build gcc 4.8.3 and
libstdc++?
Can somebody help?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-05  8:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-10-05  2:52 What is the lowest version of glibc I can use to build gcc 4.8.3 and libstdc++? 조안나
2023-10-05  6:53 ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-10-05  8:32   ` Jonathan Wakely

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).