From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ville.voutilainen@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C698C395BC4F;
 Wed,  3 Mar 2021 17:34:52 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org C698C395BC4F
Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id l132so23601236qke.7;
 Wed, 03 Mar 2021 09:34:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=dNIvCBOmp5CmzCykc86U8P78QQq+lj8LMNhAfuwNnv4=;
 b=YZYo8jQHCw6Q3L6C4okq7TxehtWgWsMeSSDhPec8Ar1qWp8Ad5BT+YLSt5x3NxRpPm
 llBmXHN3AXbR0UCfXps65hEwsD35cGHNhZktgi9F/5fVkPdh8WJyylHbDLJ+J0J8UTaJ
 5RyLbkeQUkDxSiI6FX5KH+FVSmQK5sRLEj+O7blv2vywHHJT2tiRfHGCp7VBwHxtgPut
 wpDEkxUutQ3zdpx4B5gZ3ryr0jiE+3VSXioSTe4Q3PK/l9jqccznCEIX9Pyb3VASCkSb
 y+nLnDF3y8EVX6MknkIoZ/n19EfoNsltKiJ7MDjYigi5qvJ9QgGUYFrBxkFpFyPNWaoI
 icqw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531jIf8KSnLF9zOBS+y8ibMl+BMux+ZTsGTU+l4BBeyN8lvlIMog
 n6hJK7R1ZZhs+pW+OVlLPRAeDAsMyCeraEnW20c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8qk+2AJczH+UtwLQEyhFqHNVfpvbqm017UQZ6c6ewvBLoDFcr8MlukiRQo+IVE+5CKIG5v7jO7F7ByuV33tc=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:44cc:: with SMTP id r195mr45463qka.224.1614792892505; 
 Wed, 03 Mar 2021 09:34:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1968544.UC5HiB4uFJ@tjmaciei-mobl1>
 <20210226155937.621324-1-thiago.macieira@intel.com>
 <20210226155937.621324-2-thiago.macieira@intel.com>
 <YD+egscQkmNMWaNR@redhat.com> <YD+3n697FYI57Dd2@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <YD+3n697FYI57Dd2@redhat.com>
From: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:34:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFk2RUYFPLqxMtLVYTxj153rnztvMhLtikrVeLgvH4x52Z9__g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Atomic __platform_wait: accept any 32-bit type, not
 just int
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Cc: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>,
 "libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>, 
 gcc-patches List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libstdc++ mailing list <libstdc++.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/libstdc++>,
 <mailto:libstdc++-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/>
List-Post: <mailto:libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libstdc++-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libstdc++>,
 <mailto:libstdc++-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 17:34:54 -0000

On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 19:25, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++
<libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> Oh, except that is_scalar is surprisingly expensive to instantiate
> (its defined in a really expensive way) and since we control all uses

I'll be more than happy to write you an __is_scalar for GCC 12. :P