From: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>,
Thomas Rodgers <trodgers@redhat.com>,
Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>,
"libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: C++2a synchronisation inefficient in GCC 11
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 23:18:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFk2RUYcrg9RUTb5ky5Lvadffnqq5wwBOSOPjUENmR=BtK+ZDQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdQxke5-ssRqaXvahK9Y0i4tCuWkwdKDhQ-DBOhG5epb6A@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 23:17, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've considered whether we should put things in an inline namespace until they're stable, so that when we move it from std::__unstable to std:: there's an ABI break even if nothing else changes. Just to make it clear.
>
> Maybe even a different namespace for each release. std::__gcc11, then change it to __gcc12 just to make it incompatible.
Sounds like overkill to me, just an additional burden to
remove/stabilize that inline namespacing in the happy event that we
don't
actually need to break anything.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-26 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-25 22:50 Thiago Macieira
2021-02-26 11:19 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-02-26 17:37 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-02-26 18:29 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-02-26 19:30 ` Ville Voutilainen
2021-02-26 21:17 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-02-26 21:18 ` Ville Voutilainen [this message]
2021-02-26 21:39 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-02-26 18:47 ` Ville Voutilainen
2021-02-26 23:53 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-02-26 23:58 ` Ville Voutilainen
2021-02-27 0:11 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-02-27 0:18 ` Ville Voutilainen
2021-02-27 0:36 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-02-27 0:44 ` Ville Voutilainen
2021-02-27 0:53 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-02-27 1:03 ` Ville Voutilainen
2021-03-03 14:30 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-03-03 17:07 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-03-03 17:14 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-02-27 0:22 ` Marc Glisse
2021-02-27 0:30 ` Ville Voutilainen
2021-02-27 0:43 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-03-03 14:24 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-03-03 17:12 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-02-26 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] std::latch: reduce internal implementation from ptrdiff_t to int Thiago Macieira
2021-02-26 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] Atomic __platform_wait: accept any 32-bit type, not just int Thiago Macieira
2021-03-03 14:34 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-03-03 16:21 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-03-03 17:27 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-03-03 17:34 ` Ville Voutilainen
2021-03-03 17:41 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-02-26 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] std::__atomic_wait: don't use __detail::__waiter with futex Thiago Macieira
2021-02-26 15:59 ` [PATCH 4/5] barrier: use int instead of unsigned char for the phase state Thiago Macieira
2021-02-28 15:05 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2021-03-01 16:28 ` Thomas Rodgers
2021-03-01 17:24 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-03-01 17:38 ` Thomas Rodgers
2021-03-01 17:40 ` Thomas Rodgers
2021-03-01 18:06 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-03-01 19:08 ` Thomas Rodgers
2021-03-01 18:12 ` Ville Voutilainen
2021-03-01 19:44 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-03-01 20:35 ` Ville Voutilainen
2021-03-01 21:54 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-03-01 22:04 ` Ville Voutilainen
2021-03-01 22:21 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-03-01 22:31 ` Ville Voutilainen
2021-03-01 22:40 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-02-26 15:59 ` [PATCH 5/5] barrier: optimise by not having the hasher in a loop Thiago Macieira
2021-03-03 14:36 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-02-26 18:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] std::latch: reduce internal implementation from ptrdiff_t to int Andreas Schwab
2021-02-26 19:08 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-02-26 19:31 ` Andreas Schwab
2021-02-27 0:13 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-02-28 21:31 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2021-03-01 8:56 ` Richard Biener
2021-03-03 14:56 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-03-03 15:02 ` Andreas Schwab
2021-03-03 15:10 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-03-03 15:37 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2021-03-01 16:32 ` Thomas Rodgers
2021-03-03 14:34 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-03-03 17:14 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-03-03 17:18 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-02-27 1:13 ` C++2a synchronisation inefficient in GCC 11 Thomas Rodgers
2021-02-27 1:29 ` Thomas Rodgers
2021-02-27 3:01 ` Thomas Rodgers
2021-03-01 17:46 ` Thomas Rodgers
2021-03-01 18:00 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-03-01 18:34 ` Thomas Rodgers
2021-03-01 19:11 ` Thiago Macieira
2021-02-27 2:02 ` Ville Voutilainen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFk2RUYcrg9RUTb5ky5Lvadffnqq5wwBOSOPjUENmR=BtK+ZDQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ville.voutilainen@gmail.com \
--cc=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=thiago.macieira@intel.com \
--cc=trodgers@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).