From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.kruegler@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com (mail-ed1-x52d.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52d])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E2613858402;
 Tue,  2 Nov 2021 08:49:30 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1E2613858402
Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id j21so50447763edt.11;
 Tue, 02 Nov 2021 01:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=qflJMH7BPZ53iy2nfoA4fXwKSA/VDV6uSET5zN3lEI4=;
 b=kuGe+mbBc0nqE1sM9u7N6DSqgcpgF3MxfUgGToC/Jh1QXN/DE2oWfvq9sc2H9MHmHz
 8Iw24bM0IBe2ZKxvmmO1fr6EpifwFypW+4g5BBvtL2e62aK7jSyY11aK1+a5L2FKdgIz
 KyNkBi7QKodghSai6ElagIGlPEStgXTEh7c1YlRpuY1aMVqFPL4QdKAKhrpslR67yZsj
 UEWqiBgC9UBO3WUwNrfAvKvJ6ATG8/jUtmHvCJMglkO8D1iDBWbsakqL3ApUP/qZOueZ
 Lr+4u6pJdb2Pwz3zmSyfxXD99HIH2CGAHmn8WkxBxmRRDC/gUaiuf4ytVtLx46Wp85Te
 rhZw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5309nGSCvdSHTpLrDAUXHodheW8hNuVQZGKAStdH9h5TFTs0TIPe
 XgX+Ild0hP3VSJrGZHnu330lTK0t0vno9cmcbjg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYhAJH8tV6k3g1tAu+qRh2quGlfpaeQlbfDnZGsIDMPTXaCEzK3xB46fNZSsV9T4lssQDMTomqedrkLO6nAZ8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7212:: with SMTP id
 dr18mr44038859ejc.298.1635842969130; 
 Tue, 02 Nov 2021 01:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210923180837.633173-1-rodgert@appliantology.com>
 <20210927141031.651313-1-rodgert@appliantology.com>
 <CACb0b4=dS6mPgzHtXfva9x52u4v2H_O=j=57npUDyn8rcYwU2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMmuTO_LDCtQ5nkdLg4yhp-Ar97bATvQkq0s+mG-ggOdTn=WBQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMmuTO_LDCtQ5nkdLg4yhp-Ar97bATvQkq0s+mG-ggOdTn=WBQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Kr=C3=BCgler?= <daniel.kruegler@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 09:49:18 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGNvRgAA4vEKHB-ETFVc0Mvno9OpahgDrhYSj59N8F4kD+j3=w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Clear padding bits in atomic compare_exchange
To: Thomas Rodgers <trodgers@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>, gcc Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
 "libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>, Thomas Rodgers <rodgert@twrodgers.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libstdc++ mailing list <libstdc++.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/libstdc++>,
 <mailto:libstdc++-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/>
List-Post: <mailto:libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libstdc++-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libstdc++>,
 <mailto:libstdc++-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 08:49:31 -0000

Am Di., 2. Nov. 2021 um 02:26 Uhr schrieb Thomas Rodgers via Libstdc++
<libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>:
>
> This should address Jonathan's feedback and adds support for atomic_ref<T>
>

I'm wondering why __clear_padding doesn't refer to the computed __ptr
value in the case where __builtin_clear_padding is used?

Thanks,

- Daniel