From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 142B73858D32; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 17:02:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 142B73858D32 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 142B73858D32 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::536 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712077340; cv=none; b=eFvecXBYcoamPn5E+uDc5st+BwkLa3S5aOCrbB8si25I9BrV5LHhzJtXpH5QA2FiWg2oa8kjQKd5f3/U8aoK0msAAKlycZuBkiUZtp1BOzqwvt3UD/nWIr5JwzizcTHH67Q/jOmRaPeo+piJooZVSt0n3hWJhf/QTK3nYWaMlsM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712077340; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2PwJo787rS7AeWWiNHuEbqeqkKhrwpsN4TmOTzm2dAE=; h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To; b=SLEr/xtreAjiqoMyUPfUOz0nC4Q999o4b2KBS7rrviLpnPzn+rD0pO1DRpzQb0Ye3jmOMISejQ4n6R54qIp/5l6B1NabUIiIzBDsZ3IeDSIUH5VZWd12KwCK/XW6dCaY+bYJWmgVCIUzJUjxAk/wnDQ4vCamqrA3x1osAsz60tQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-56be32b9775so7213047a12.1; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 10:02:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712077328; x=1712682128; darn=gcc.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2PwJo787rS7AeWWiNHuEbqeqkKhrwpsN4TmOTzm2dAE=; b=hO+EVZtayCxg2wzB2rbW1CvuXhPKtuJWKpqBNynR0DaOZnKsOoMFcvZ8QR9QLaKDsE 6Nutdn+X4b/r73ntcaVgPp5G0ct9fyG7j74lQ1/Ipgi9V8mwwsVK5lNNAppz6EqGXP0y L/XRBAjfGMtGU/B8yjwZEvLXu7ZdsASDYL7Ndi7T04n0xTOIvqJapeQcXsHTfHIp0Qhj f83WBGAUrIWEkmIBVcODZ2ES/HZ4+x9Vd4yZgl3GquFGE/2eo+9iNiHSa5p+qqWaVEWi ud2Ig6Ju9XAzI3AsNbeYCI15/nLxzxKybr5W+lR7B2lSVUAtx+UBdPRuYuD/X9Ht1HW4 pIcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712077328; x=1712682128; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=2PwJo787rS7AeWWiNHuEbqeqkKhrwpsN4TmOTzm2dAE=; b=FDWyh9AmBMvMfAOuyEmqWQtAP2FS+LSqWScy6F0nISGSAd/odb83iqU6QuDEKsAHLa lpDgC6EWMsYEsAv5+C3ibpEhBW74r0V1r+CTFtoHpAkhCmR8YUYO+0MmGsu5RP19nUpi Zpm1Odq3aVTIgYP2mEFA9kygZbyjEWi9YWM8aNUwzXjzA8f4FN3ojGui8gy6g/9UqOIW 1GlpXULn/6uQm3OE7GFSUk3vbf8bUUJvBALg8SXUErSkXorNSjV75IOsrLiKMIVJ1gDJ SDFGYk/vjUHTXyBab4nhC76+7OXvCJlYa/Yzy9Aa5DvAZhkIoiWkYk7ilihW5+o+ahl5 Zh6Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUvmZw2Bb7DR9SZm1wRxz/PnsXIVuliHgqB+cjy5zTMpC3RObYvL1Q+Ri31DWXCSGy2PbOuMg/8BX7RwO3v8i32BavDWy42329fd8HFw9HKZv1K4+FaZO9tKUiA0Qnf X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx0v/xjcFw6ASzl+ry/RBOna4REPmr0hAJAK89ZW0dzIKatx/+6 jI3WYDN1nvGbhiatrRRbfqD8cLylRz6N4b3UzCWL3asJLCS1lHoxGrPuwEpjGuRM7JpnMeTEyow dNQqG/TcH/E0e1TDEkmp5D2ba8iI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG894RChSOoJyNvkbqOTaY1wzVy9XK3O/aOk00zpu+7yluXMzX9l4/lFyLCrSv8zEmdey80wvDLez8eIt/Cu+8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ca0b:b0:a4e:dd7:4e24 with SMTP id jt11-20020a170906ca0b00b00a4e0dd74e24mr203909ejb.23.1712077327448; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 10:02:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:01:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Allow adjacent __maybe_present_t to overlap To: Pilar Latiesa Cc: ppalka@redhat.com, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 18:00, Pilar Latiesa wrote: > > Just out of curiosity: would this also work? > > template > struct _Absent {}; > > template > using __maybe_present_t = __conditional_t<_Present, _Tp, _Absent<_Tp, _Disc>>; > > That would avoid having to type 0, 1, ... manually. This is subjectively horrible and, more objectively, would create longer mangled names and additional RTTI.