From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com (mail-ej1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::629]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF819385354D for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 19:27:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org BF819385354D Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id r18so5425821eja.11 for ; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 12:27:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=ExCm6VHT/tiCCFxW+Jt72JqaW8WgzJNKkkqhQzu/dNc=; b=gLOqU6rctZ2gIQ1kNZkMdLqO4PtkAarYUZD4RlBCDAYlZeNYtSbud4470qCT+2kzuc 6OcKwZHNP2wB2TrPtateXZ1yzX5OKXevvcNgfY8Zu3aHm7g5tm6HgbOoDEhq1IPm30up CkL/eLysd1du5dkbczFI6qvBSoDfu7nsYD+bK3fCoVYVbHz2NO9mHS3wXPWfHhGrubBn 1r9G7L64JFbnpNzdvni0alz+1UvkJyl3Q9SK0SbQk8356eVsXxqdY1Aj4DU2Ssfzj00w tpWYMR98EMpDYBdKsVOLtqrp2zc5LIWl1mRZZM+a0gLMEbrND7ds3oftKs5aTYgKf0L8 hL+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=ExCm6VHT/tiCCFxW+Jt72JqaW8WgzJNKkkqhQzu/dNc=; b=VRBL0a2QuIVv5X+MD8JaYzxH1KQ2MnfU2scdUo3ADmEeAiZCbeHfzWgIibeacDwlvc 20jNjNLr26EWbGJQOnwWC6D3d9EVIIl9ymuHIAXRdmD5tzitid+o3cgjd475uv/3yJAn 3HlMZueTbotTrxiUycbJXA97UKixl9YTLy3jrNUqpao5niGX7bNe8QrJOoBx+3/SmzvN OfBgJdgcDno3063SeOeCknVMeVBbyY54O5x0ztJsQjbM0AOi8SMsFpkuhi5MxaAxYG4h V1YS445PTphNyfl73ejZHp7N4lVyiy0QoWHTUZMF1i4Cs5poeqPj32lwJXzQTTuO/tnm JUZA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3R59PFYDYdCtPyLfJtU/yBWDBrLp/kdHX4eCcybOsBGDQeb7JD Isqh8m0PLd0XIoBRUMJhcNMrhmkPsVl8vG9MPxc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR43Io2fFlOCwT+fHlZ/PqYpgHgc/Hsctvxo12PZHm+Wtc2Lpi2mERiyPj6MX8UKY6YsQ0leaZ+iTrakeYio8CI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4fd0:b0:73d:be5b:291d with SMTP id i16-20020a1709064fd000b0073dbe5b291dmr3359015ejw.506.1662578839285; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 12:27:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 20:27:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: GPL carve-out missing for barrier To: Tom James Cc: "libstdc++" , Moritz Kreutzer , "Jones, Philip" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 12:22, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 10:49, Tom James wrote: > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > Thanks for that, that's all useful information. > > > > I've had a more detailed chat with our legal people and I think getting this fixed in master solves the problem for us. I've pushed the change to master now. Backports will follow at some point before the next releases from the branches. Thanks for noticing the problem and bringing it to our attention! > > > > I had wondered whether it would be possible to bump the 11.2 tag > > No, definitely not. > > > to include this change because it's not code, but actually that shouldn't be necessary. It looks like we don't use barrier at the moment, and we're unlikely to do so any time soon. > > > > Thanks, > > Tom > > > > On Tue, 6 Sept 2022 at 11:56, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, 6 Sept 2022 at 11:29, Tom James wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I'm working on a closed-source c++ project that compiles with gcc 11.2. We > >> > need to ship the GNU 11.2 run-time alongside our product, and it looks like > >> > the std::barrier header is missing the GPL3 carve-out for shipping > >> > run-times. > >> > >> Ouch, I'm pretty sure that's unintentional. I'll go back through my > >> email to confirm that. > >> > >> > >> > For the purposes of comparison, let's look at algorithm: > >> > https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/include/std/algorithm > >> > > >> > Lines 16-18 read as follows: > >> > // Under Section 7 of GPL version 3, you are granted additional > >> > // permissions described in the GCC Runtime Library Exception, version > >> > // 3.1, as published by the Free Software Foundation. > >> > > >> > These lines are necessary to prevent the GPL infecting our closed-source > >> > code. > >> > >> What exactly are you shipping? There is no code from in > >> libstdc++.so so unless your own code is including the header > >> and odr-using the inline functions and templates in that header, I > >> think your compiled code will not be affected by the license of > >> . If you are including that header in the works you > >> propagate, or shipping it to customers for compiling their own works > >> which they will propagate, then the license exception matters. > >> > >> > The barrier header appears to be missing these lines: > >> > https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/include/std/barrier > >> > > >> > > >> > Would it be possible to please make the following changes? > >> > 1. Add these lines to the master branch, > >> > 2. Backport these lines to gnu 11.2 (which is the most recent version > >> > supported by our toolchain). > >> > >> No, we can't backport anything to 11.2 because that's already been released. > >> > >> I'll add it to the master, gcc-12, and gcc-11 branches, which will > >> mean it's present for 11.4, 12.3 and 13.1 (and all releases that > >> follow them). > >> > >> If you are producing a combined work that includes the code, > >> then unless/until you're able to wait for 11.4 and use that, you could > >> copy the fixed header into your own GCC 11.2 that you distribute. > > > > > > > > -- > > Tom James > > > > Siemens Digital Industries Software > > Simulation and Test Solutions, Solution Domains Development, Server, Platform, Simulation Framework, High Performance Computing > > thomasjames@siemens.com > > sw.siemens.com