From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
To: "François Dumont" <frs.dumont@gmail.com>
Cc: "libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enhance unordered container merge
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:10:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdRz4MxVSfYRWfYViotxGWQgcqmdM+2tUgnv0K9Rq8=isA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e66557c-131e-eed0-fc7c-3d1eefd1dcf9@gmail.com>
On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 06:00, François Dumont wrote:
>
> On 15/11/21 12:25 am, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 at 13:31, François Dumont via Libstdc++
> > <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >> libstdc++: Unordered containers merge re-use hash code.
> >>
> >> When merging between 2 unordered containers with same hasher we can
> >> re-use
> >> the cached hash code if any.
> > Instead of introducing the _ReuseOrComputeHash type, wouldn't it be
> > simpler to just overload _M_hash_code?
> >
> >
> > // Same hash function, use the cached hash code.
> > __hash_code
> > _M_hash_code(const _Hash&,
> > const _Hash_node_value<_Value, true>& __n) const
> > { return __n._M_hash_code; }
> >
> > // Compute hash code using a different hash function, _H2
> > template<typename _H2>
> > __hash_code
> > _M_hash_code(const _H2&,
> > const _Hash_node_value<_Value, __cache_hash_code>& __n) const
> > { return this->_M_hash_code(_ExtractKey{}(__n._M_v()); }
> >
> > The first overload is more specialized, so will be chosen when the
> > first argument is the same type as _Hash and the cache_has_code
> > boolean is true.
>
> Yes, it is simpler.
>
> Ok to commit ?
Yes, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-15 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-14 13:29 François Dumont
2021-11-14 23:25 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-11-15 6:00 ` François Dumont
2021-11-15 9:10 ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAH6eHdRz4MxVSfYRWfYViotxGWQgcqmdM+2tUgnv0K9Rq8=isA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=frs.dumont@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).