From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 816F8385802E
 for <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon,  4 Jan 2021 02:45:16 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 816F8385802E
Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id a12so30725701wrv.8
 for <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 18:45:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=/HIHFtW4qBCp7dgDJBp9rHMaEzfxnbmUBS1ZSKJuRiU=;
 b=irN831RyIW9UGtFoR6Jvzf/c7oQWXWI1wIXk0/eLAKQ7fNAVhox3188Qc4X7iB+xt5
 6jvYpQ/eoG6UmGE5+zxJPyT2jlusBKvDorFAZ9DuIQRH+bc8DCdleneUNgm7oLl327hr
 BzakkdMoEjQH2fmaMGabUq6YbBlWrAZBGKeJ1XDxGegjqhcGC+O4TQ2bHNmUJFRxD1c7
 kCe5f0vxk6/a8le7SBik2zLrI5NwsRLzPEVgYjUtZJlEjw35EJFClnlxGQX0iyPqeJ34
 onxbVC8pQij1rvZPg5zT66XSo8FXUdqeok3uqbdK3qnf5Xn2n7V9UMkvCop1ozzO61G4
 EF2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531L7kyn/Rl8f2ZpFWSOhur1LvC7CR9fRTk63DVxPD5y9ff1KUbk
 sO90+hhBeM/jZ3RpwCGi9IcONiEchhCoIzXp35g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxhl+CyfGEnViMt1BOgJX3yYinWe4rvWTdIlfri4RVTn1UaDvwMlLqxeEWfFqn7nHQd3Mjb+ldmkVCFWuQRpiY=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4e8c:: with SMTP id e12mr75768716wru.321.1609728315416; 
 Sun, 03 Jan 2021 18:45:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAGWvnyn9xWAYbbMbsYLJD-YGtrsFr1gQQE_3bSqMU7bTSzpG-Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGWvnyn9xWAYbbMbsYLJD-YGtrsFr1gQQE_3bSqMU7bTSzpG-Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 02:45:03 +0000
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdSTyFiW8QoG8wyXT1wEaenY35cCCmuvGFK_h6UCTVO8rA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [libstdc++] Inconsistent detection of __int128
To: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>, "libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>, 
 Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>, "CHIGOT,
 CLEMENT" <clement.chigot@atos.net>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
 KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libstdc++ mailing list <libstdc++.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/libstdc++>,
 <mailto:libstdc++-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/>
List-Post: <mailto:libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libstdc++-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libstdc++>,
 <mailto:libstdc++-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 02:45:17 -0000

On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, 00:44 David Edelsohn via Libstdc++, <
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

>
> Or is there some other reason that _GLIBCXX_USE_INT128 and
> __SIZEOF_INT128__ are used in different contexts?
>

Yes.

I'll reply when I'm back from taking some time off. Probably Wednesday.