From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Cc: "libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>,
gcc Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [committed] libstdc++: Fix filesystem::path comparisons for C++23
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 14:58:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKdteObxa9o-X-xeBOnuU=5j6eO4DeGACRoHFnC7yL-jujwBHg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YMOqVPLt9IDNJbSi@redhat.com>
Hi Jonathan,
On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 20:25, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> In C++23 there is a basic_string_view(Range&&) constructor, which is
> constrained to take a range (specifically, a contiguous_range). When the
> filesystem::path comparison operators call lhs.compare(rhs) the overload
> taking a string_view is considered, which means checking whether path
> satisfies the range concept. That satisfaction result changes depending
> whether path::iterator is complete, which is ill-formed; no diagnostic
> required. To avoid the problem, this change ensures that the overload
> resolution is performed in a context where path::iterator is complete
> and the range concept is satisfied. (The result of overload resolution
> is always that the compare(const path&) overload is the best match, but
> we still have to consider the compare(basic_string_view<value_type>) one
> to decide if it even participates in overload resolution).
>
> For std::filesystem::path we can't define the comparison operators later
> in the file, because they are hidden friends, so a new helper is
> introduced that gets defined when everything else is complete.
>
> For std::experimental::filesystem::path we can just move the definitions
> of the comparison operators later in the file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> * include/bits/fs_path.h (operator==, operator<=>): Use new
> _S_compare function.
> (path::_S_compare): New function to call path::compare in a
> context where path::iterator is complete.
> * include/experimental/bits/fs_path.h (operator<, operator==):
> Define after path::iterator is complete.
> * testsuite/27_io/filesystem/path/native/conv_c++23.cc: New
> test.
> * testsuite/experimental/filesystem/path/native/conv_c++23.cc:
> New test.
>
> Tested powerpc64le-linux. Committed to trunk.
>
> This also needs to be backported to gcc-11 where the string_view
> constructor is present for C++23 mode.
>
The new test experimental/filesystem/path/native/conv_c++23.cc
fails on arm-eabi and aarch64-elf:
/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/filesystem/path/native/conv_c++23.cc:4:
fatal error: experimental/filesystem: No such file or directory
(both trunk and gcc-11)
I guess that's easy to fix? :-)
Thanks,
Christophe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-14 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-11 18:24 Jonathan Wakely
2021-06-14 12:58 ` Christophe Lyon [this message]
2021-06-14 14:19 ` Jonathan Wakely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKdteObxa9o-X-xeBOnuU=5j6eO4DeGACRoHFnC7yL-jujwBHg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=christophe.lyon@linaro.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).