From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 34580 invoked by alias); 31 May 2019 05:58:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libstdc++-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libstdc++-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 34565 invoked by uid 89); 31 May 2019 05:58:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*c:alternative, yours X-HELO: mail-lf1-f51.google.com Received: from mail-lf1-f51.google.com (HELO mail-lf1-f51.google.com) (209.85.167.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 May 2019 05:58:57 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-f51.google.com with SMTP id u27so6889632lfg.10; Thu, 30 May 2019 22:58:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rI+18dBpDgVLGrqmqYd4jOnAcx6WnhQ9EjroOvURytA=; b=t+ubokLFSqFTbr6Z48bsV/86b2drQ5tjrkQr3WFWwr1JswB0mTXFzJuJoHqh78/sww IljgE63+nogmYMn9Ax7NXtWG1CK8xAazkABkmTl8QfbBdOVKJhSKPztjDx3U7alPVAJ4 CyuLFUKRarUWUKbSrdzOHTmRM4CSbUl5Wt90lCjzoeb41bR9X5qTbFHh3MSCsmdLwIqn qV8AKsEwxZdPA18Xu1PjS1R+uo8ouOIOUoTLr4rlVtitV4ZeHATdfcKH9iIWQJZMPEtp Z/knNyYIKj9FdT2VU8DLnYfxGmmRerCMlXojuFfMDVQ0KSPi5U5/N796HzhKHePn2Vmm NbFQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190508211032.GD2599@redhat.com> <20190530163808.GP2599@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190530163808.GP2599@redhat.com> From: Antony Polukhin Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 05:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR libstdc++/71579 assert that type traits are not misused with an incomplete type To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: "libstdc++" , gcc-patches List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-05/txt/msg00254.txt.bz2 On Thu, May 30, 2019, 19:38 Jonathan Wakely wrote: <...> > I've attached a relative diff, to be applied on top of yours, with my > suggested tweaks. Do you see any issues with it? > > (If you're happy with those tweaks I can go ahead and apply this, > there's no need for an updated patch from you). > Looks good. Please apply! >