From: YumeYao <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: libstdc++ ABI update rule? (baseline_symbols.txt)
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 23:09:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALBhkEfssCRNReN0jfpB+jpEVRwjBhrM9cmxay-c-YE+cYq=Fw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
I'm trying to do some experimental optimization to libstdc++, which
involves heavy use of __builtin_constant_p(), this, however,
eventually impacts how gcc calculate inlining or not, hence I got
error when testing libstdc++ about ABI changes.
Specifically, I met most of such issues when optimizing basic_string.
Then I tried fix the ABI changes by templatizing the functions, adding
__attribute__((always_inline)) and even gnu_inline(sometimes adding
only always_inline breaks the optimization, I noticed this issue very
long ago...) to the failed parts, which in turn makes other existing
functions in libstdc++ got uninlined and present in libstdc++.so as
ABI changes of added symbols/functions.
What really confuses me is the following fact:
without any attribute notation and only by templatizing functions, I
managed to get a version working on some old gcc version without any
abi change. But it then failed when I migrated it to a newer version.
I have some basic knowledge about extern template and inlining and
symbols, etc. and I tried to find the answers from gcc source, but
obviously there's something beyond the source.
I know inline decision is calculated by pseudo "cost", therefore not
only the change in library could make an ABI change, but also the
logic change in gcc inline calculator could make such change, even
more, how the user uses the code can also make a difference on inline
decision because the times or frequency of using a library function
can also impact the inline decision.
So I want to ask:
1. how the ABI of libstdc++ is maintained in gcc, just update
baseline_symbols.txt unconditionally when preparing for a release?
2. How does gcc decide to put which symbol to libstdc++.so? I can see
files named xxxx-inst(antiation).cc but obviously some symbols not
belonging to it get instantiated and put in libstdc++.so
Thanks in advance,
next reply other threads:[~2022-08-09 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-09 15:09 YumeYao [this message]
2022-08-10 13:55 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-08-12 20:44 ` YumeYao
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).