From: Frederick Virchanza Gotham <cauldwell.thomas@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Cc: "libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: string::iterator should have more error checking
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 11:10:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALtZhhO5Hw=HhLMq1YpmS1y_N4VdC=vc7-qi8f=iB71XB3Wyow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACb0b4nXa0w1dBBjV9zJ6k+APGHEXXNNGdSz5dnRgDAY3P_FCw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 10:35 AM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
> That's expected. The contents of the string_view are a string literal,
> which is in the program image, not on the heap.
Valgrind is the best tool for troubleshooting heap problems (although
it's useless against non-heap problems).
> AddressSanitizer
> doesn't check access to such memory.
> The byte after the string literal "brush" is uninitialized, but it
> does exist in a valid memory page.
Check out how "-fsanitize" flags the following invalid access to
static-duration constexpr arrays:
https://godbolt.org/z/fjnPTWj5P
Having thought about this a little more, I realise that "brush" in memory is:
char constexpr brush[6u] = { 'b', 'r', 'u', 's', 'h', '\0' };
And so therefore it is perfectly valid to access the null terminator
located at brush[5u], which is why the access is not flagged by
"-fsanitize".
> And it's not detected by Debug Mode because string_view iterators are
> just pointers.
I understand that. I think there should be "<debug/string_view>" and
that it should be optionally configurable to barf when it encounters a
null terminator. (It must be optionally configurable because a null
char is actually a valid char inside a string_view). Something like:
#define _GLIBCXX_STRINGVIEW_DONT_ALLOW_NULL_CHAR
#include <debug/string_view>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-24 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-23 21:05 Frederick Virchanza Gotham
2022-06-23 21:26 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-06-23 22:01 ` Frederick Virchanza Gotham
2022-06-23 22:35 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-06-24 9:06 ` Frederick Virchanza Gotham
2022-06-24 9:35 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-06-24 10:10 ` Frederick Virchanza Gotham [this message]
2022-06-24 10:28 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-06-24 11:14 ` Frederick Virchanza Gotham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALtZhhO5Hw=HhLMq1YpmS1y_N4VdC=vc7-qi8f=iB71XB3Wyow@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=cauldwell.thomas@gmail.com \
--cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).