From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7303138715B9 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 09:44:32 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 7303138715B9 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1670924672; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type; bh=7ePoG3mcrrSoYl7+erVOpRN09c8swCvn8Py9DbcAliA=; b=N0VrGcGoy8pZNVYlXzLjKFmbVyOhqlQeMMfMR3xVt2q5pmpV81cMjb34G+mvvfFSwlWS+H RzkIqBygBEHXId13pZtJsFCyQojAevedfpWX0n/SWACM/ei8vnEEdovQGIoxXkoXctEQ4C oRsCoq37N6GgBzq5OjPRtNXskoh/rBM= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-38-b_HL4gXUNlC4iQ-DzW8h5A-1; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 04:44:28 -0500 X-MC-Unique: b_HL4gXUNlC4iQ-DzW8h5A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 789E9101E14E; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 09:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.195.114]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31152C15BA0; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 09:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 2BD9iNDl1939411 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:44:24 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 2BD9iNet1939410; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:44:23 +0100 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:44:23 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: Update backtrace-rename.h Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.8 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi! When writing the r13-4629 commit log I've realized that libsanitizer isn't the only place which nowadays renames libbacktrace symbols, libstdc++ does that too. Ok for trunk if this passes bootstrap/regtest? 2022-12-13 Jakub Jelinek * src/libbacktrace/backtrace-rename.h (backtrace_uncompress_zstd): Define. --- libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/backtrace-rename.h.jj 2022-09-01 09:37:58.452624676 +0200 +++ libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/backtrace-rename.h 2022-12-13 10:41:14.551699599 +0100 @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #define backtrace_syminfo __glibcxx_backtrace_syminfo #define backtrace_uncompress_lzma __glibcxx_backtrace_uncompress_lzma #define backtrace_uncompress_zdebug __glibcxx_backtrace_uncompress_zdebug +#define backtrace_uncompress_zstd __glibcxx_backtrace_uncompress_zstd #define backtrace_vector_finish __glibcxx_backtrace_vector_finish #define backtrace_vector_grow __glibcxx_backtrace_vector_grow #define backtrace_vector_release __glibcxx_backtrace_vector_release Jakub