Re: [committed] i386: Fix grammar typo in diagnostic

[Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 10:12:35PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Committed as obvious.
> 
> Less obvious (to me) is whether it's correct to say "GCC V13" here. I
> don't think we refer to a version that way anywhere else, do we?
> 
> Would "since GCC 13.1.0" be better?

x86_field_alignment uses

              inform (input_location, "the alignment of %<_Atomic %T%> "
                                      "fields changed in %{GCC 11.1%}",

so maybe the below should use %{GCC 13.1%}.  "GCC V13" looks unusual
to me.

> -- >8 --
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* config/i386/i386.cc (ix86_invalid_conversion): Fix grammar.
> ---
>  gcc/config/i386/i386.cc | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> index 50860050049..5d57726e22c 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> @@ -22890,7 +22890,7 @@ ix86_invalid_conversion (const_tree fromtype, const_tree totype)
>  	warning (0, "%<__bfloat16%> is redefined from typedef %<short%> "
>  		"to real %<__bf16%> since GCC V13, be careful of "
>  		 "implicit conversion between %<__bf16%> and %<short%>; "
> -		 "a explicit bitcast may be needed here");
> +		 "an explicit bitcast may be needed here");
>      }
>  
>    /* Conversion allowed.  */
> -- 
> 2.41.0
> 

Marek