From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C8A23857B82 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:15:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 0C8A23857B82 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 0C8A23857B82 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1705580123; cv=none; b=CI4RNE2aYpHxbihUBw1bc2jwlqq1Z0pLBD75ZR8ACor8Owa6RvOlXXnsGNBblJ2KACj/5FjP4rkkNaLaFhwPwC6c7zDJ9vBPikVmxAoqvT6m/9Wea0VvsuKsmyt+aPfooa2Lq7p2QaDBX7gsUgjj/SEMeWHLoc160U1f2e2ypWc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1705580123; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ag9Doio1gkesysPCbT3mxE/14v/uEPMYh8BrC5Vg29k=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=IXBKQpdkIvJfobJaSKu0Inej3BaeUd4CKIdmWNr7EOPMYa0mhtafH4f7NDL+ZI1o15lCm2djWZ6DmEueV/G3p2jS+rI5Y1v5hBgrKc1ZhW+T2rC0AazRstF1N2sCvb6rEsJZzyD+sOBleBbaPYzVea2wvbtCP7YLGN4nJCV54UI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1705580121; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=0/7juTi+6uP/hoAlXtTjM8m46Iu2OrZqPm0B+LNZnKM=; b=Zjs7nqr39V/TGIl8PdHTtx+83zRgfgZ4MNNPpeoDyt+oC8PPQ17GhxyAB0PP5f2tnPtjis DJiO49TOfLPjlSu33vQb4UHwlsA/3I0bC5qciQFQwuNaaA+GLnjCF8KwsB8fzlxSrUb2aE 9tLeJyepanYAm8QCmzielnlqUBRbDFU= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-692-5shoq37EMzKxmTw9RgV5Iw-1; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 07:15:20 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 5shoq37EMzKxmTw9RgV5Iw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EE25863E80; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.70]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E62032028CD4; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 40ICFHP8247592 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Jan 2024 13:15:17 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 40ICFEo8247591; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 13:15:14 +0100 Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 13:15:14 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Rainer Orth Cc: Andreas Schwab , libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Update baseline symbols for riscv64-linux Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.4 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 01:11:56PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote: > Andreas Schwab writes: > > > * config/abi/post/riscv64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Update. > > Speaking of baselines: is this a good time to update them for other > targets, too, or should we better wait a little longer? I think we usually do this in March or so, not in January. Jakub