From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA76A3858C62; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 18:56:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org DA76A3858C62 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site; s=default; t=1689188188; bh=nyMNMM8SGr/XtwzJdgYWcq5LMKhXM1AGjbES/jmftOA=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DDp6lxJlWDuX7Nk59/ayAxo5PKI+ouwiIeyuXjUBxC1YdACGOht7ZqwkDOPlHQrAb uZqU1ygrm+v2mVhgl+EcqGMeGwDQcbj7wwBvz4oXKQTidkZGw3T9K7XHeIm9J30+QN +idJIw0PhbeSk+dr4MMkil8YE1CAS1diURoroeVk= Received: from localhost.localdomain (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site) by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDB6565B8A; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 14:56:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] libstdc++: use new built-in trait __is_scalar for std::is_scalar From: Xi Ruoyao To: Ken Matsui , Jonathan Wakely Cc: Ken Matsui , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 02:56:26 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20230708044539.61276-1-kmatsui@gcc.gnu.org> <20230708044539.61276-2-kmatsui@gcc.gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 11:32 -0700, Ken Matsui via Gcc-patches wrote: > > conditional on the front-end change being committed first of course >=20 > Does this mean we want to commit this [2/2] patch before committing > the [1/2] patch in this case? No, this mean you should get 1/2 reviewed and committed first. > Also, can I tweak the commit message without being approved again, > such as attaching the benchmark result? Yes, as long as the ChangeLog is still correct (the Git hook will reject a push with wrong ChangeLog format anyway). --=20 Xi Ruoyao School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University