From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++/112351 - deal with __gthread_once failure during locale init
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 12:51:57 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2311061242320.8772@jbgna.fhfr.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACb0b4=ptSyaoqeh0dkrPvc15qAjqoh=CUKN+wUVLWU=WbRVhQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 11:52, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > The following makes the C++98 locale init path follow the way the
> > C++11 performs initialization. This way we deal with pthread_once
> > failing, falling back to non-threadsafe initialization which, given we
> > initialize from the library, should be serialized by the dynamic
> > loader already.
> >
> > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, OK for trunk?
> > And GCC 13 branch?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Richard.
> >
> > PR libstdc++/112351
> > libstdc++-v3/
> > * src/c++98/locale.cc (locale::facet::_S_get_c_locale):
> > Always perform non-threadsafe init when threadsafe init
> > failed.
> > ---
> > libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale.cc | 7 ++-----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale.cc b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale.cc
> > index d308140bab7..e9bec1db3b6 100644
> > --- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale.cc
> > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale.cc
> > @@ -216,12 +216,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
> > #ifdef __GTHREADS
> > if (__gthread_active_p())
> > __gthread_once(&_S_once, _S_initialize_once);
> > - else
> > #endif
> > - {
> > - if (!_S_c_locale)
> > - _S_initialize_once();
> > - }
> > + if (__builtin_expect (!_S_c_locale, 0))
> > + _S_initialize_once();
> > return _S_c_locale;
> > }
>
>
> I think this has a problem, which is handled correctly in
> src/c++11/locale_init.cc by checking _S_classic inside the
> _S_initialize_once function.
We check _S_c_locale here (it's just a pointer) instead of in
_S_initialize_once (), so I think the code is equivalent, no?
> If the first call to __gthread_once does fail then _S_once will not be
> changed. We will fall through to calling _S_initialize_once directly
> (which is not thread-safe) and set _S_c_locale.
>
> The next time we call _S_initialize, __gthread_once will try to run
> again, and because _S_once was not changed, it might call
> _S_initialize_once() again, which writes to _S_c_locale again
> (possibly causing a data race).
Ah, yeah, so in the C++11 path the check for !_S_classic in
locale::_S_initialize is redundant. But good spot.
> I don't think the slightly different code in src/c++11/locale_init.cc
> is different in order to handle __gthread_once failing, I think it's
> different because the effects of locale::facet::_S_initialize_once()
> and locale::_S_initialize_once() are different. One is safe to call
> more than once, and the other isn't.
>
> I don't think we need to care about __gthread_once failing at all, do
> we? There are no error conditions for pthread_once, it always returns
> 0 (previous POSIX revisions said it could return EINVAL for an
> uninitialized pthread_once_t but that can't happen here as it's
> correctly initialized in src/c++11/locale.cc). Is the concern that it
> can fail for non-posix thread models? (I didn't check if any of them
> can actually fail)
The concern is that there are actual products out that break with the
new I/O initialization in libstdc++ for GCC13+ because they have bugs.
It's easy enough to work around those by the proposed patch (plus
correction for the above issue). I suppose the comment in
locale::_S_initialize_once holds as well for the C++98 path.
The failure mode of the product is that it overrides pthread_once
but does nothing (not even indicate failure) when its pthread_*
override mechanism isn't initialized yet. With libstdc++ from GCC13
we now use pthread_once "too early" and fail to initialize the locale
object.
Adjusted patch below.
OK after another round of testing?
Thanks,
Richard.
From 4e3fa2f4426a5a10d189587b63e4d7298c347b01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 11:31:40 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++/112351 - deal with __gthread_once failure during
locale init
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
The following makes the C++98 locale init path follow the way the
C++11 performs initialization. This way we deal with pthread_once
failing, falling back to non-threadsafe initialization which, given we
initialize from the library, should be serialized by the dynamic
loader already.
PR libstdc++/112351
libstdc++-v3/
* src/c++98/locale.cc (locale::facet::_S_initialize_once):
Check whether _S_c_locale is already initialized.
(locale::facet::_S_get_c_locale): Always perform non-threadsafe
init when threadsafe init failed.
---
libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale.cc | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale.cc b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale.cc
index d308140bab7..1ef0c394cd7 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale.cc
@@ -206,6 +206,12 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
void
locale::facet::_S_initialize_once()
{
+ // Need to check this because we could get called once from
+ // _S_get_c_locale() when the program is single-threaded, and then again
+ // (via __gthread_once) when it's multi-threaded.
+ if (_S_c_locale)
+ return;
+
// Initialize the underlying locale model.
_S_create_c_locale(_S_c_locale, _S_c_name);
}
@@ -216,12 +222,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
#ifdef __GTHREADS
if (__gthread_active_p())
__gthread_once(&_S_once, _S_initialize_once);
- else
#endif
- {
- if (!_S_c_locale)
- _S_initialize_once();
- }
+ if (__builtin_expect (!_S_c_locale, 0))
+ _S_initialize_once();
return _S_c_locale;
}
--
2.35.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-06 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <11125.123110606520900751@us-mta-255.us.mimecast.lan>
2023-11-06 12:15 ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-11-06 12:51 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2023-11-07 10:55 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-07 11:44 ` Jonathan Wakely
[not found] <20231106115212.6DCC23858C00@sourceware.org>
2023-11-06 12:16 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-11-06 12:17 ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-11-06 11:52 Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2311061242320.8772@jbgna.fhfr.qr \
--to=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).