From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
"libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: retry removal of dir entries if dir removal fails
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 04:52:28 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <or7d4yvb9f.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <orpmiuxmma.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org> (Alexandre Oliva's message of "Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:27:25 -0300")
On Jun 27, 2022, Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com> wrote:
> I see two potential ways to avoid this:
Another possibility occurred to me: seeking back to the entry we're
about to remove, before removing it. Then, POSIX-compliant
implementations will just skip the removed entry and find the next one,
while RTEMS will find the next entry at the spot where the removed entry
used to be.
It is syscall-heavier, and it may invoke O(n^2) behavior for each
directory in remove_all, since prev_pos is quite likely to always hold
the initial offset, requiring scanning past more and more removed
entries after each removal, so I don't submit this formally for
inclusion, but post it FTR. I've only confirmed that it solves the
problem on RTEMS, passing libstdc++ filesystem test, but I haven't
tested it further.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fs_dir.cc b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fs_dir.cc
index 2258399da2587..43e2d9678eae5 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fs_dir.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fs_dir.cc
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct fs::_Dir : _Dir_base
// Reports errors by setting ec.
bool advance(bool skip_permission_denied, error_code& ec) noexcept
{
+ prev_pos = posix::telldir(dirp);
if (const auto entp = _Dir_base::advance(skip_permission_denied, ec))
{
auto name = path;
@@ -146,6 +147,12 @@ struct fs::_Dir : _Dir_base
bool
do_unlink(bool is_directory, error_code& ec) const noexcept
{
+ // On some systems, removing the just-read entry causes the next
+ // readdir to skip the entry that comes after it. That's not
+ // POSIX-compliant, but we can work around this problem by moving
+ // back to the position of the last-read entry, as if it was to be
+ // read again next, before removing it.
+ posix::seekdir(dirp, prev_pos);
#if _GLIBCXX_HAVE_UNLINKAT
const auto atp = current();
if (::unlinkat(atp.dir(), atp.path_at_dir(),
@@ -176,6 +183,7 @@ struct fs::_Dir : _Dir_base
fs::path path; // Empty if only using unlinkat with file descr.
directory_entry entry;
+ long prev_pos;
};
namespace
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/dir-common.h b/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/dir-common.h
index 228fab55afbcf..6174a8ef3c228 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/dir-common.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/dir-common.h
@@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ using char_type = wchar_t;
using DIR = ::_WDIR;
using dirent = _wdirent;
inline DIR* opendir(const wchar_t* path) { return ::_wopendir(path); }
+inline long telldir(DIR* dir) { ::_wtelldir(dir); }
+inline void seekdir(DIR *dir, long loc) { ::_wseekdir(dir, loc); }
inline dirent* readdir(DIR* dir) { return ::_wreaddir(dir); }
inline int closedir(DIR* dir) { return ::_wclosedir(dir); }
#elif defined _GLIBCXX_HAVE_DIRENT_H
@@ -64,6 +66,8 @@ typedef struct ::dirent dirent;
using ::opendir;
using ::readdir;
using ::closedir;
+using ::telldir;
+using ::seekdir;
#else
using char_type = char;
struct dirent { const char* d_name; };
@@ -71,6 +75,8 @@ struct DIR { };
inline DIR* opendir(const char*) { return nullptr; }
inline dirent* readdir(DIR*) { return nullptr; }
inline int closedir(DIR*) { return -1; }
+inline long telldir(DIR *) { return -1; }
+inline void seekdir(DIR *, long) { }
#undef _GLIBCXX_HAVE_DIRFD
#undef _GLIBCXX_HAVE_UNLINKAT
#endif
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice
but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-30 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-22 6:19 Alexandre Oliva
2022-06-22 9:45 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-06-23 1:02 ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-06-27 13:27 ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-06-29 5:16 ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-06-30 7:52 ` Alexandre Oliva [this message]
2022-06-30 8:19 ` Sebastian Huber
2022-07-05 17:39 ` Alexandre Oliva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=or7d4yvb9f.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org \
--to=oliva@adacore.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).