From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Cc: "François Dumont" <frs.dumont@gmail.com>,
"Jonathan Wakely" <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>,
libstdc++ <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: bvector: undef always_inline macro
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 01:40:31 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <oro7fuxqdc.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACb0b4nNoWSLED++yFHW_bj26c4CgAs8bP7k_xJRSeyAQ8ARnw@mail.gmail.com> (Jonathan Wakely's message of "Wed, 15 Nov 2023 08:22:23 +0000")
On Nov 15, 2023, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
> I thought I even checked my assumption, but I don't see it in my shell
> history now.
Heh, I could promise I checked it myself. ISTR even locating and
copying it from another header, but maybe it was the define rather than
the undef. Oh well. Sorry about the temporary regression.
> Sorry for the mixup.
No worries there
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity
Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-16 4:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-08 16:10 [PATCH] libstdc++: optimize bit iterators assuming normalization [PR110807] Alexandre Oliva
2023-11-08 19:32 ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-11-09 1:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Alexandre Oliva
2023-11-09 1:22 ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-11-09 3:36 ` [PATCH v3] " Alexandre Oliva
2023-11-09 5:57 ` François Dumont
2023-11-09 8:16 ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-11-09 19:49 ` [PATCH] libstdc++: bvector: undef always_inline macro Alexandre Oliva
2023-11-09 20:18 ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-11-15 2:20 ` Patrick Palka
2023-11-15 5:53 ` Alexandre Oliva
2023-11-15 2:44 ` Alexandre Oliva
2023-11-15 5:08 ` Alexandre Oliva
2023-11-15 8:22 ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-11-16 4:40 ` Alexandre Oliva [this message]
2024-02-07 16:25 ` [PATCH v2] libstdc++: optimize bit iterators assuming normalization [PR110807] Torbjorn SVENSSON
2024-02-07 16:36 ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-02-09 8:49 ` Torbjorn SVENSSON
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=oro7fuxqdc.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org \
--to=oliva@adacore.com \
--cc=frs.dumont@gmail.com \
--cc=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).