From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.160.84]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E1E43848023 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:19:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6E1E43848023 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFE9A9836; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:19:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vrsExj8cOkmK; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:19:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (p50854661.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.133.70.97]) by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86DBDA9552; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:19:00 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE; s=20200306; t=1626956340; bh=ewwVHd8REgybl/W560Q4d3Srtg+GzUpwohGHD8FdfT8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=eyATD67Dvov4A/w6U9hBCUJTKM5cITb8HCbe7sgFnx3XZ2MC/GEbIhacEod3h0VAG m3vyM09G2iR5ChAyu7eAaU3uv/Z2fCLuJO9jKMDEWhUbGI3+dkRJ6Ps352FkJH31kM /9WOL8jW4SEslVf+N6EUtvfmDnlMAw4sut8TnWomUF1CVN7nTlHn1BStysnhz+Bivo lGZJrpUMJyW9ScN4QEkzrRhW+x+15I05N/aKVsZXkuJ+8UDHaAOaeXADommrl5jeY+ GtfdjO0AxeUy1MeCBMrLYfU44HwsWTa3k+QfqsIntypF3QHnoI7w3MzNq5uMyKUtJu aLlpY8LYimz4A== From: Rainer Orth To: "CHIGOT, CLEMENT" Cc: libstdc++ , Jonathan Wakely , David Edelsohn Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: implement locale support for AIX References: <20210122112910.GI541588@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:19:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: (CLEMENT CHIGOT's message of "Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:09:06 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3786.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libstdc++ mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:19:06 -0000 Hi Clement, >>> A part from that it would be good if someone familiar with >>> freebsd or dragonfly can take a look at it. There shouldn't be >>> any problems but it needs to be tested and a few #ifdef remain >>> for these two targets. >> >> I'd tried DragonflyBSD quite some time ago, but couldn't even get it to >> boot in VirtualBox and didn't want to spend too much time on it. >> >> However, the last i586-unknown-freebsd11.4 test results for unmodified >> trunk are still terrible, showing 101 FAILs in libstdc++, a large number >> among those being locale tests. I had seen (not unexpectedly) similarly >> abysmal results when I tried an earlier version of your patch on (I >> believe) FreeBSD 12 in VirtualBox some time ago, which made me question >> if that clocale implementation is a good basis for xpg7 if it doesn't >> even work on the target it's supposed to support. >> >> Could you please share the libstdc++-v3 mail-report.log snippet you get >> on AIX with your latest patch as a point of comparison? > > Here are the result for AIX 32bit. Those are a bit different in 64bit but > not much. > However, I don't have all the locale installed so some are skipped. > > Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.3.0 > > === libstdc++ tests === [...] > === libstdc++ Summary === > > # of expected passes 13692 > # of unexpected failures 44 > # of expected failures 114 > # of unresolved testcases 15 > # of unsupported tests 559 Those are even worse than the Solaris ones: === libstdc++ Summary for unix === # of expected passes 15153 # of unexpected failures 29 # of expected failures 97 # of unsupported tests 504 > If you can, can you show me the result for FreeBSD, I might have already > encountered some of the failures while developing AIX version. The latest I see on gcc-testresults are here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-July/708163.html I haven't fired up my FreeBSD VM in a long time, but I expect Gerald will easily be able to provide more details. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University