LVM2 tools/lvmcmdlib.c lib/mm/memlock.h lib/mm ...

[mornfall@sourceware.org]

CVSROOT:	/cvs/lvm2
Module name:	LVM2
Changes by:	mornfall@sourceware.org	2009-11-19 01:11:57

Modified files:
	tools          : lvmcmdlib.c 
	lib/mm         : memlock.h memlock.c 

Log message:
	Fix another bug in memlock handling, this time the "global" dmeventd memlock
	was preventing device scans in lvconvert --repair running from inside dmeventd.

Patches:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/tools/lvmcmdlib.c.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.9&r2=1.10
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/lib/mm/memlock.h.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/lib/mm/memlock.c.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.13&r2=1.14

--- LVM2/tools/lvmcmdlib.c	2009/02/22 22:11:59	1.9
+++ LVM2/tools/lvmcmdlib.c	2009/11/19 01:11:57	1.10
@@ -82,9 +82,9 @@
 	/* FIXME Temporary - move to libdevmapper */
 	ret = ECMD_PROCESSED;
 	if (!strcmp(cmdline, "_memlock_inc"))
-		memlock_inc();
+		memlock_inc_daemon();
 	else if (!strcmp(cmdline, "_memlock_dec"))
-		memlock_dec();
+		memlock_dec_daemon();
 	else
 		ret = lvm_run_command(cmd, argc, argv);
 
--- LVM2/lib/mm/memlock.h	2007/08/20 20:55:27	1.4
+++ LVM2/lib/mm/memlock.h	2009/11/19 01:11:57	1.5
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
 
 void memlock_inc(void);
 void memlock_dec(void);
+void memlock_inc_daemon(void);
+void memlock_dec_daemon(void);
 int memlock(void);
 void memlock_init(struct cmd_context *cmd);
 
--- LVM2/lib/mm/memlock.c	2009/11/18 18:22:32	1.13
+++ LVM2/lib/mm/memlock.c	2009/11/19 01:11:57	1.14
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
 
 static void *_malloc_mem = NULL;
 static int _memlock_count = 0;
+static int _memlock_count_daemon = 0;
 static int _priority;
 static int _default_priority;
 
@@ -123,22 +124,61 @@
 			  strerror(errno));
 }
 
+static void _lock_mem_if_needed(void) {
+	if ((_memlock_count + _memlock_count_daemon) == 1)
+		_lock_mem();
+}
+
+static void _unlock_mem_if_possible(void) {
+	if ((_memlock_count + _memlock_count_daemon) == 0)
+		_unlock_mem();
+}
+
 void memlock_inc(void)
 {
-	if (!_memlock_count++)
-		_lock_mem();
+	++_memlock_count;
+	_lock_mem_if_needed();
 	log_debug("memlock_count inc to %d", _memlock_count);
 }
 
 void memlock_dec(void)
 {
-	if (_memlock_count && (!--_memlock_count))
-		_unlock_mem();
-	log_debug("memlock_count dec to %d", _memlock_count);
-	if (_memlock_count < 0)
+	if (!_memlock_count)
 		log_error("Internal error: _memlock_count has dropped below 0.");
+	--_memlock_count;
+	_unlock_mem_if_possible();
+	log_debug("memlock_count dec to %d", _memlock_count);
 }
 
+/*
+ * The memlock_*_daemon functions will force the mlockall() call that we need
+ * to stay in memory, but they will have no effect on device scans (unlike
+ * normal memlock_inc and memlock_dec). Memory is kept locked as long as either
+ * of memlock or memlock_daemon is in effect.
+ */
+
+void memlock_inc_daemon(void)
+{
+	++_memlock_count_daemon;
+	_lock_mem_if_needed();
+	log_debug("memlock_count_daemon inc to %d", _memlock_count_daemon);
+}
+
+void memlock_dec_daemon(void)
+{
+	if (!_memlock_count_daemon)
+		log_error("Internal error: _memlock_count_daemon has dropped below 0.");
+	--_memlock_count_daemon;
+	_unlock_mem_if_possible();
+	log_debug("memlock_count_daemon dec to %d", _memlock_count_daemon);
+}
+
+/*
+ * This disregards the daemon (dmeventd) locks, since we use memlock() to check
+ * whether it is safe to run a device scan, which would normally coincide with
+ * !memlock() -- but the daemon global memory lock breaks this assumption, so
+ * we do not take those into account here.
+ */
 int memlock(void)
 {
 	return _memlock_count;