public inbox for lvm2-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mornfall@sourceware.org
To: lvm-devel@redhat.com, lvm2-cvs@sourceware.org
Subject: LVM2/daemons/lvmetad lvmetad-core.c
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110725175951.14924.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
CVSROOT: /cvs/lvm2
Module name: LVM2
Changes by: mornfall@sourceware.org 2011-07-25 17:59:51
Modified files:
daemons/lvmetad: lvmetad-core.c
Log message:
lvmetad: Edit the MISSING_PV flags only after making a "reply" copy of the
metadata, which is then serialised and discarded. This fixes a couple of
outstanding TODO items about handling the MISSING flags correctly.
Patches:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/daemons/lvmetad/lvmetad-core.c.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.21&r2=1.22
--- LVM2/daemons/lvmetad/lvmetad-core.c 2011/07/25 15:51:51 1.21
+++ LVM2/daemons/lvmetad/lvmetad-core.c 2011/07/25 17:59:50 1.22
@@ -65,6 +65,89 @@
unlock_vgs(s);
}
+static struct config_node *pvs(struct config_node *vg)
+{
+ struct config_node *pv = find_config_node(vg, "metadata/physical_volumes");
+ if (pv)
+ pv = pv->child;
+ return pv;
+}
+
+/*
+ * TODO: This set_flag function is pretty generic and might make sense in a
+ * library here or there.
+ */
+static void set_flag(struct config_tree *cft, struct config_node *parent,
+ char *field, const char *flag, int want) {
+ struct config_value *value = NULL, *pred = NULL;
+ struct config_node *node = find_config_node(parent->child, field);
+ int found = 0;
+
+ if (node)
+ value = node->v;
+
+ while (value && value->type != CFG_EMPTY_ARRAY && strcmp(value->v.str, flag)) {
+ pred = value;
+ value = value->next;
+ }
+
+ if (value && want)
+ return;
+
+ if (!value && !want)
+ return;
+
+ if (value && !want) {
+ if (pred)
+ pred->next = value->next;
+ if (value == node->v)
+ node->v = value->next;
+ }
+
+ if (!value && want) {
+ if (!node) {
+ node = create_config_node(cft, field);
+ node->sib = parent->child;
+ node->v = create_config_value(cft);
+ node->v->type = CFG_EMPTY_ARRAY;
+ node->parent = parent;
+ parent->child = node;
+ }
+ struct config_value *new = create_config_value(cft);
+ new->type = CFG_STRING;
+ new->v.str = flag;
+ new->next = node->v;
+ node->v = new;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Either the "big" vgs lock, or a per-vg lock needs to be held before entering
+ * this function. */
+static int update_pv_status(lvmetad_state *s, struct config_tree *cft, struct config_node *vg, int act)
+{
+ int complete = 1;
+
+ lock_pvs(s);
+ struct config_node *pv = pvs(vg);
+ while (pv) {
+ const char *uuid = find_config_str(pv->child, "id", NULL);
+ int found = uuid ? (dm_hash_lookup(s->pvs, uuid) ? 1 : 0) : 0;
+ if (act)
+ set_flag(cft, pv, "status", "MISSING", !found);
+ if (!found) {
+ complete = 0;
+ if (!act) { // optimisation
+ unlock_pvs(s);
+ return complete;
+ }
+ }
+ pv = pv->sib;
+ }
+ unlock_pvs(s);
+
+ return complete;
+}
+
static response vg_by_uuid(lvmetad_state *s, request r)
{
const char *uuid = daemon_request_str(r, "uuid", "NONE");
@@ -92,14 +175,11 @@
res.error = 0;
unlock_vg(s, uuid);
+ update_pv_status(s, cft, n, 1);
+
return res;
}
-/*
- * TODO: Accept different flag permutations? Or else, ensure fixed ordering of
- * flags in set_flag below (following the same order as we have in
- * lib/format_text/flags.c).
- */
static int compare_value(struct config_value *a, struct config_value *b)
{
if (a->type > b->type)
@@ -143,85 +223,6 @@
return result;
}
-/*
- * TODO: This set_flag function is pretty generic and might make sense in a
- * library here or there.
- */
-static void set_flag(struct config_tree *cft, struct config_node *parent,
- char *field, const char *flag, int want) {
- struct config_value *value = NULL, *pred = NULL;
- struct config_node *node = find_config_node(parent->child, field);
- int found = 0;
-
- if (node)
- value = node->v;
-
- while (value && value->type != CFG_EMPTY_ARRAY && strcmp(value->v.str, flag)) {
- pred = value;
- value = value->next;
- }
-
- if (value && want)
- return;
-
- if (!value && !want)
- return;
-
- if (value && !want) {
- if (pred)
- pred->next = value->next;
- if (value == node->v)
- node->v = value->next;
- }
-
- if (!value && want) {
- if (!node) {
- node = create_config_node(cft, field);
- node->sib = parent->child;
- node->v = create_config_value(cft);
- node->v->type = CFG_EMPTY_ARRAY;
- node->parent = parent;
- parent->child = node;
- }
- struct config_value *new = create_config_value(cft);
- new->type = CFG_STRING;
- new->v.str = flag;
- new->next = node->v;
- node->v = new;
- }
-}
-
-struct config_node *pvs(struct config_tree *vg)
-{
- struct config_node *pv = find_config_node(vg->root, "metadata/physical_volumes");
- if (pv)
- pv = pv->child;
- return pv;
-}
-
-/* Either the "big" vgs lock, or a per-vg lock needs to be held before entering
- * this function. */
-static int update_pv_status(lvmetad_state *s, struct config_tree *vg)
-{
- int complete = 1;
-
- lock_pvs(s);
- struct config_node *pv = pvs(vg);
- while (pv) {
- const char *uuid = find_config_str(pv->child, "id", NULL);
- int found = uuid ? (dm_hash_lookup(s->pvs, uuid) ? 1 : 0) : 0;
- // TODO: avoid the override here if MISSING came from the actual
- // metadata, as opposed from our manipulation...
- set_flag(vg, pv, "status", "MISSING", !found);
- if (!found)
- complete = 0;
- pv = pv->sib;
- }
- unlock_pvs(s);
-
- return complete;
-}
-
/* You need to be holding the pvid_map lock already to call this. */
int update_pvid_map(lvmetad_state *s, struct config_tree *vg, const char *vgid)
{
@@ -261,7 +262,6 @@
if (seq == haveseq) {
retval = 1;
- // TODO: disregard the MISSING_PV flag status in this comparison
if (compare_config(metadata, old->root))
retval = 0;
goto out;
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@
int complete = 0;
if (vgid) {
struct config_tree *cft = lock_vg(s, vgid);
- complete = update_pv_status(s, cft);
+ complete = update_pv_status(s, cft, cft->root, 0);
unlock_vg(s, vgid);
}
next reply other threads:[~2011-07-25 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-25 17:59 mornfall [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-23 10:34 zkabelac
2012-02-27 10:19 zkabelac
2012-02-27 10:10 zkabelac
2012-02-24 0:24 mornfall
2012-02-24 0:12 mornfall
2012-02-21 9:19 mornfall
2012-02-15 17:37 mornfall
2012-02-15 17:30 mornfall
2012-02-15 14:15 mornfall
2012-02-15 14:06 mornfall
2012-02-15 11:43 mornfall
2012-02-13 14:25 zkabelac
2012-01-25 21:42 zkabelac
2011-12-18 22:31 mornfall
2011-09-17 13:33 zkabelac
2011-09-02 11:04 zkabelac
2011-07-25 15:51 mornfall
2011-07-25 15:33 mornfall
2011-07-20 21:33 mornfall
2011-07-20 21:27 mornfall
2011-07-20 21:26 mornfall
2011-07-20 21:23 mornfall
2011-07-20 18:45 mornfall
2011-07-20 18:34 mornfall
2011-07-20 18:24 mornfall
2011-07-20 16:49 mornfall
2011-07-20 16:46 mornfall
2011-07-20 15:14 mornfall
2011-07-19 19:15 mornfall
2011-07-19 14:14 mornfall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110725175951.14924.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=mornfall@sourceware.org \
--cc=lvm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=lvm2-cvs@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).