public inbox for lvm2-cvs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mornfall@sourceware.org To: lvm-devel@redhat.com, lvm2-cvs@sourceware.org Subject: LVM2/daemons/lvmetad lvmetad-core.c Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:59:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20110725175951.14924.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) CVSROOT: /cvs/lvm2 Module name: LVM2 Changes by: mornfall@sourceware.org 2011-07-25 17:59:51 Modified files: daemons/lvmetad: lvmetad-core.c Log message: lvmetad: Edit the MISSING_PV flags only after making a "reply" copy of the metadata, which is then serialised and discarded. This fixes a couple of outstanding TODO items about handling the MISSING flags correctly. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/daemons/lvmetad/lvmetad-core.c.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.21&r2=1.22 --- LVM2/daemons/lvmetad/lvmetad-core.c 2011/07/25 15:51:51 1.21 +++ LVM2/daemons/lvmetad/lvmetad-core.c 2011/07/25 17:59:50 1.22 @@ -65,6 +65,89 @@ unlock_vgs(s); } +static struct config_node *pvs(struct config_node *vg) +{ + struct config_node *pv = find_config_node(vg, "metadata/physical_volumes"); + if (pv) + pv = pv->child; + return pv; +} + +/* + * TODO: This set_flag function is pretty generic and might make sense in a + * library here or there. + */ +static void set_flag(struct config_tree *cft, struct config_node *parent, + char *field, const char *flag, int want) { + struct config_value *value = NULL, *pred = NULL; + struct config_node *node = find_config_node(parent->child, field); + int found = 0; + + if (node) + value = node->v; + + while (value && value->type != CFG_EMPTY_ARRAY && strcmp(value->v.str, flag)) { + pred = value; + value = value->next; + } + + if (value && want) + return; + + if (!value && !want) + return; + + if (value && !want) { + if (pred) + pred->next = value->next; + if (value == node->v) + node->v = value->next; + } + + if (!value && want) { + if (!node) { + node = create_config_node(cft, field); + node->sib = parent->child; + node->v = create_config_value(cft); + node->v->type = CFG_EMPTY_ARRAY; + node->parent = parent; + parent->child = node; + } + struct config_value *new = create_config_value(cft); + new->type = CFG_STRING; + new->v.str = flag; + new->next = node->v; + node->v = new; + } +} + +/* Either the "big" vgs lock, or a per-vg lock needs to be held before entering + * this function. */ +static int update_pv_status(lvmetad_state *s, struct config_tree *cft, struct config_node *vg, int act) +{ + int complete = 1; + + lock_pvs(s); + struct config_node *pv = pvs(vg); + while (pv) { + const char *uuid = find_config_str(pv->child, "id", NULL); + int found = uuid ? (dm_hash_lookup(s->pvs, uuid) ? 1 : 0) : 0; + if (act) + set_flag(cft, pv, "status", "MISSING", !found); + if (!found) { + complete = 0; + if (!act) { // optimisation + unlock_pvs(s); + return complete; + } + } + pv = pv->sib; + } + unlock_pvs(s); + + return complete; +} + static response vg_by_uuid(lvmetad_state *s, request r) { const char *uuid = daemon_request_str(r, "uuid", "NONE"); @@ -92,14 +175,11 @@ res.error = 0; unlock_vg(s, uuid); + update_pv_status(s, cft, n, 1); + return res; } -/* - * TODO: Accept different flag permutations? Or else, ensure fixed ordering of - * flags in set_flag below (following the same order as we have in - * lib/format_text/flags.c). - */ static int compare_value(struct config_value *a, struct config_value *b) { if (a->type > b->type) @@ -143,85 +223,6 @@ return result; } -/* - * TODO: This set_flag function is pretty generic and might make sense in a - * library here or there. - */ -static void set_flag(struct config_tree *cft, struct config_node *parent, - char *field, const char *flag, int want) { - struct config_value *value = NULL, *pred = NULL; - struct config_node *node = find_config_node(parent->child, field); - int found = 0; - - if (node) - value = node->v; - - while (value && value->type != CFG_EMPTY_ARRAY && strcmp(value->v.str, flag)) { - pred = value; - value = value->next; - } - - if (value && want) - return; - - if (!value && !want) - return; - - if (value && !want) { - if (pred) - pred->next = value->next; - if (value == node->v) - node->v = value->next; - } - - if (!value && want) { - if (!node) { - node = create_config_node(cft, field); - node->sib = parent->child; - node->v = create_config_value(cft); - node->v->type = CFG_EMPTY_ARRAY; - node->parent = parent; - parent->child = node; - } - struct config_value *new = create_config_value(cft); - new->type = CFG_STRING; - new->v.str = flag; - new->next = node->v; - node->v = new; - } -} - -struct config_node *pvs(struct config_tree *vg) -{ - struct config_node *pv = find_config_node(vg->root, "metadata/physical_volumes"); - if (pv) - pv = pv->child; - return pv; -} - -/* Either the "big" vgs lock, or a per-vg lock needs to be held before entering - * this function. */ -static int update_pv_status(lvmetad_state *s, struct config_tree *vg) -{ - int complete = 1; - - lock_pvs(s); - struct config_node *pv = pvs(vg); - while (pv) { - const char *uuid = find_config_str(pv->child, "id", NULL); - int found = uuid ? (dm_hash_lookup(s->pvs, uuid) ? 1 : 0) : 0; - // TODO: avoid the override here if MISSING came from the actual - // metadata, as opposed from our manipulation... - set_flag(vg, pv, "status", "MISSING", !found); - if (!found) - complete = 0; - pv = pv->sib; - } - unlock_pvs(s); - - return complete; -} - /* You need to be holding the pvid_map lock already to call this. */ int update_pvid_map(lvmetad_state *s, struct config_tree *vg, const char *vgid) { @@ -261,7 +262,6 @@ if (seq == haveseq) { retval = 1; - // TODO: disregard the MISSING_PV flag status in this comparison if (compare_config(metadata, old->root)) retval = 0; goto out; @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ int complete = 0; if (vgid) { struct config_tree *cft = lock_vg(s, vgid); - complete = update_pv_status(s, cft); + complete = update_pv_status(s, cft, cft->root, 0); unlock_vg(s, vgid); }
next reply other threads:[~2011-07-25 17:59 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-07-25 17:59 mornfall [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2012-03-23 10:34 zkabelac 2012-02-27 10:19 zkabelac 2012-02-27 10:10 zkabelac 2012-02-24 0:24 mornfall 2012-02-24 0:12 mornfall 2012-02-21 9:19 mornfall 2012-02-15 17:37 mornfall 2012-02-15 17:30 mornfall 2012-02-15 14:15 mornfall 2012-02-15 14:06 mornfall 2012-02-15 11:43 mornfall 2012-02-13 14:25 zkabelac 2012-01-25 21:42 zkabelac 2011-12-18 22:31 mornfall 2011-09-17 13:33 zkabelac 2011-09-02 11:04 zkabelac 2011-07-25 15:51 mornfall 2011-07-25 15:33 mornfall 2011-07-20 21:33 mornfall 2011-07-20 21:27 mornfall 2011-07-20 21:26 mornfall 2011-07-20 21:23 mornfall 2011-07-20 18:45 mornfall 2011-07-20 18:34 mornfall 2011-07-20 18:24 mornfall 2011-07-20 16:49 mornfall 2011-07-20 16:46 mornfall 2011-07-20 15:14 mornfall 2011-07-19 19:15 mornfall 2011-07-19 14:14 mornfall
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20110725175951.14924.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=mornfall@sourceware.org \ --cc=lvm-devel@redhat.com \ --cc=lvm2-cvs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).