public inbox for lvm2-cvs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jbrassow@sourceware.org To: lvm-devel@redhat.com, lvm2-cvs@sourceware.org Subject: LVM2 ./WHATS_NEW lib/metadata/mirror.c Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:59:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20110913135920.4871.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) CVSROOT: /cvs/lvm2 Module name: LVM2 Changes by: jbrassow@sourceware.org 2011-09-13 13:59:19 Modified files: . : WHATS_NEW lib/metadata : mirror.c Log message: Fix for bug 733114. When an image is split from a 2-way mirror, the original mirror is converted to a linear device. To do this, the top "layer" must be removed. The segments are transferred from the sub-lv to the top-level LV and the link is severed. The former sub-lv - having its segments transferred - now contains a temporary error target. When the original LV is resumed, the old sub-lv that now contains an error segment is activated and scanned. This is what causes the I/O error messages. There are three ways to fix this problem: 1) Do not set the sub-lv which contains the error target as "visible" before suspending the original LV. This way, when the original is resumed, the sub-lv device node is not created and it is not scanned - avoiding the error messages. The problem with this approach is that if the machine crashes after the resume, it leaves the *hidden* LV in place and the user has a more difficult time noticing that it needs to be cleaned up. Thus, this type of processing is frowned upon. 2) Do like _remove_mirror_images does and suspend the original, then suspend the sub-lv (the error target), then resume the sub-lv, and finally resume the original LV. This seems like extra pointless operations to me, but it does not produce the error message (although, I'm not sure why) and it allows us to leave the visible flag in place. 3) Flag the sub-lv (error target) with a "do not scan" flag. This seems like the cleanest approach, but I have been unable to find the method for doing this. LVs get tagged in such a way by _get_udev_flags, but in this case the resume of the original LV also resumes the error target LV without running it through _get_udev_flags (likely because they are no longer linked). Could there be something wrong in resume_lv? Option #2 was chosen to fix this bug, but it seems like more of a workaround for now. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/WHATS_NEW.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.2101&r2=1.2102 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/lib/metadata/mirror.c.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.162&r2=1.163 --- LVM2/WHATS_NEW 2011/09/08 20:55:39 1.2101 +++ LVM2/WHATS_NEW 2011/09/13 13:59:19 1.2102 @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ Version 2.02.89 - ================================== + Work around resume_lv causing error LV scanning during splitmirror operation. Add 7th lv_attr char to show the related kernel target. Terminate pv_attr field correctly. (2.02.86) Fix 'not not' typo in pvcreate man page. --- LVM2/lib/metadata/mirror.c 2011/09/06 19:25:43 1.162 +++ LVM2/lib/metadata/mirror.c 2011/09/13 13:59:19 1.163 @@ -666,6 +666,10 @@ return 0; } + /* Suspend temporary error target (see FIXME for resume below) */ + if (sub_lv && !suspend_lv(sub_lv->vg->cmd, sub_lv)) + return_0; + if (!vg_commit(mirrored_seg->lv->vg)) { resume_lv(cmd, mirrored_seg->lv); return 0; @@ -674,6 +678,42 @@ log_very_verbose("Updating \"%s\" in kernel", mirrored_seg->lv->name); /* + * FIXME: +When an image is split from a 2-way mirror, the original mirror is converted to +a linear device. To do this, the top "layer" must be removed. The segments +are transferred from the sub-lv to the top-level LV and the link is severed. +The former sub-lv - having its segments transferred - now contains a temporary +error target. + +When the original LV is resumed, the old sub-lv that now contains an error +segment is activated and scanned. This causes I/O error messages. There are +three ways to fix this problem: + +1) Do not set the sub-lv which contains the error target as "visible" before +suspending the original LV. This way, when the original is resumed, the sub-lv +device node is not created and it is not scanned - avoiding the error messages. + The problem with this approach is that if the machine crashes after the +resume, it leaves the *hidden* LV in place and the user has a more difficult +time noticing that it needs to be cleaned up. Thus, this type of processing is +frowned upon. + +2) Do like _remove_mirror_images does and suspend the original, then suspend +the sub-lv (the error target), then resume the sub-lv, and finally resume the +original LV. This seems like extra pointless operations to me, but it does not +produce the error message (although, I'm not sure why) and it allows us to +leave the visible flag in place. ** THIS IS THE CHOSEN SOLUTION HERE ** + +3) Flag the sub-lv (error target) with a "do not scan" flag. This seems like +the cleanest approach, but I have been unable to find the method for doing +this. LVs get tagged in such a way by _get_udev_flags, but in this case the +resume of the original LV also resumes the error target LV without running it +through _get_udev_flags (likely because they are no longer linked). Could +there be something wrong in resume_lv? + */ + if (sub_lv && !resume_lv(sub_lv->vg->cmd, sub_lv)) + return_0; + + /* * Resume the mirror - this also activates the visible, independent * soon-to-be-split sub-LVs */
next reply other threads:[~2011-09-13 13:59 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-09-13 13:59 jbrassow [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2012-03-23 16:28 mbroz 2012-02-01 13:50 zkabelac 2011-10-25 13:17 jbrassow 2011-10-06 14:49 jbrassow 2011-09-14 2:45 jbrassow 2011-09-13 21:13 jbrassow 2011-09-13 14:37 jbrassow 2011-09-01 19:22 jbrassow 2011-06-17 14:27 zkabelac 2010-08-16 18:02 jbrassow 2010-07-13 22:24 jbrassow 2010-07-13 21:48 jbrassow 2010-07-09 15:08 jbrassow 2010-06-28 14:19 jbrassow 2010-06-21 16:12 jbrassow 2010-04-27 15:27 jbrassow 2010-04-27 14:57 jbrassow 2009-12-09 19:53 mbroz 2009-12-09 18:09 mbroz 2009-04-10 9:53 mbroz 2008-10-17 10:50 agk 2008-09-18 19:09 agk 2008-06-13 12:15 meyering 2008-02-22 13:28 agk 2007-11-22 13:57 agk 2006-11-30 17:52 agk 2006-11-10 19:35 agk 2006-07-20 20:37 agk
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20110913135920.4871.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=jbrassow@sourceware.org \ --cc=lvm-devel@redhat.com \ --cc=lvm2-cvs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).