public inbox for lvm2-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jbrassow@sourceware.org
To: lvm-devel@redhat.com, lvm2-cvs@sourceware.org
Subject: LVM2 ./WHATS_NEW lib/metadata/mirror.c
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 14:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111006144921.14536.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)

CVSROOT:	/cvs/lvm2
Module name:	LVM2
Changes by:	jbrassow@sourceware.org	2011-10-06 14:49:19

Modified files:
	.              : WHATS_NEW 
	lib/metadata   : mirror.c 

Log message:
	Revert initial solution to bug 733114 - I/O error message during splitmirror
	
	The original commit comments can be located via this git commit ID:
	7d8e615c0b30fc2ef300c90378a51f01c328128c
	
	There were three possible solutions to the original problem proposed in the
	initial check-in.  The one chosen was as follows:
	2) Do like _remove_mirror_images does and suspend the original, then suspend
	the sub-lv (the error target), then resume the sub-lv, and finally resume the
	original LV.  This seems like extra pointless operations to me, but it doesn't
	produce the error message (although, I'm not sure why) and it allows us to
	leave the visible flag in place.
	Turns out, the cluster also views the extra suspend/resume operations as
	pointless too and ignores them.  So, this solution doesn't work in a cluster.
	Further, I've noticed that in addition to the remote cluster nodes still getting
	I/O errors from scanning the error target, they also have a different LVM and
	DM views of the same LV.  IOW, while the LVM level (gotten from the LVM metadata)
	sees the correct name for the newly split LV, device-mapper still maintains the
	old names.
	
	Because the original fix failed to completely fix the problem (or work-around it)
	and because a better solution must be found to address the additional cluster
	issue of device renaming, I am reverting the above mentioned commit.

Patches:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/WHATS_NEW.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.2147&r2=1.2148
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/lib/metadata/mirror.c.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.171&r2=1.172

--- LVM2/WHATS_NEW	2011/10/06 14:45:40	1.2147
+++ LVM2/WHATS_NEW	2011/10/06 14:49:16	1.2148
@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@
   Fix failure to down-convert a mirror to linear due to udev "dev open" conflict
   Fix mirrored log creation when PE size is small - force log_size >= region_size
   Fix log size calculation when only a log is being added to a mirror.
-  Work around resume_lv causing error LV scanning during splitmirror operation.
   Add 7th lv_attr char to show the related kernel target.
   Terminate pv_attr field correctly. (2.02.86)
   Fix 'not not' typo in pvcreate man page.
--- LVM2/lib/metadata/mirror.c	2011/09/19 14:28:23	1.171
+++ LVM2/lib/metadata/mirror.c	2011/10/06 14:49:16	1.172
@@ -673,10 +673,6 @@
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	/* Suspend temporary error target (see FIXME for resume below) */
-	if (sub_lv && !suspend_lv(sub_lv->vg->cmd, sub_lv))
-		return_0;
-
 	if (!vg_commit(mirrored_seg->lv->vg)) {
 		resume_lv(cmd, mirrored_seg->lv);
 		return 0;
@@ -685,42 +681,6 @@
 	log_very_verbose("Updating \"%s\" in kernel", mirrored_seg->lv->name);
 
 	/*
-	 * FIXME:
-When an image is split from a 2-way mirror, the original mirror is converted to
-a linear device.  To do this, the top "layer" must be removed.  The segments
-are transferred from the sub-lv to the top-level LV and the link is severed. 
-The former sub-lv - having its segments transferred - now contains a temporary
-error target.
-
-When the original LV is resumed, the old sub-lv that now contains an error
-segment is activated and scanned.  This causes I/O error messages.  There are
-three ways to fix this problem:
-
-1) Do not set the sub-lv which contains the error target as "visible" before
-suspending the original LV.  This way, when the original is resumed, the sub-lv
-device node is not created and it is not scanned - avoiding the error messages.
- The problem with this approach is that if the machine crashes after the
-resume, it leaves the *hidden* LV in place and the user has a more difficult
-time noticing that it needs to be cleaned up.  Thus, this type of processing is
-frowned upon.
-
-2) Do like _remove_mirror_images does and suspend the original, then suspend
-the sub-lv (the error target), then resume the sub-lv, and finally resume the
-original LV.  This seems like extra pointless operations to me, but it does not
-produce the error message (although, I'm not sure why) and it allows us to
-leave the visible flag in place.  ** THIS IS THE CHOSEN SOLUTION HERE **
-
-3) Flag the sub-lv (error target) with a "do not scan" flag.  This seems like
-the cleanest approach, but I have been unable to find the method for doing
-this.  LVs get tagged in such a way by _get_udev_flags, but in this case the
-resume of the original LV also resumes the error target LV without running it
-through _get_udev_flags (likely because they are no longer linked).  Could
-there be something wrong in resume_lv?
-	*/
-	if (sub_lv && !resume_lv(sub_lv->vg->cmd, sub_lv))
-		return_0;
-
-	/*
 	 * Resume the mirror - this also activates the visible, independent
 	 *                     soon-to-be-split sub-LVs
 	 */


             reply	other threads:[~2011-10-06 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-06 14:49 jbrassow [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-23 16:28 mbroz
2012-02-01 13:50 zkabelac
2011-10-25 13:17 jbrassow
2011-09-14  2:45 jbrassow
2011-09-13 21:13 jbrassow
2011-09-13 14:37 jbrassow
2011-09-13 13:59 jbrassow
2011-09-01 19:22 jbrassow
2011-06-17 14:27 zkabelac
2010-08-16 18:02 jbrassow
2010-07-13 22:24 jbrassow
2010-07-13 21:48 jbrassow
2010-07-09 15:08 jbrassow
2010-06-28 14:19 jbrassow
2010-06-21 16:12 jbrassow
2010-04-27 15:27 jbrassow
2010-04-27 14:57 jbrassow
2009-12-09 19:53 mbroz
2009-12-09 18:09 mbroz
2009-04-10  9:53 mbroz
2008-10-17 10:50 agk
2008-09-18 19:09 agk
2008-06-13 12:15 meyering
2008-02-22 13:28 agk
2007-11-22 13:57 agk
2006-11-30 17:52 agk
2006-11-10 19:35 agk
2006-07-20 20:37 agk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111006144921.14536.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=jbrassow@sourceware.org \
    --cc=lvm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=lvm2-cvs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).