From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7741 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2002 19:10:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mauve-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: mauve-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7731 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2002 19:10:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (212.0.243.3) by sources.redhat.com with QMTP; 9 Dec 2002 19:10:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 9594 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2002 19:10:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dogx200-017.intra.tryllian.net) (212.0.243.10) by outcast.tryllian.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2002 19:10:41 -0000 Subject: Re: ResourceBundle variants and child variants From: Mark Wielaard To: Andrew Haley Cc: mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <15860.58123.895049.444714@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> References: <1039286784.5707.18.camel@elsschot> <15860.32315.697847.431056@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <1039458865.2921.233.camel@dogx200-017> <15860.58123.895049.444714@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 11:10:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1039461046.21312.256.camel@dogx200-017> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Message: scanned for viruses by AMaViS X-SW-Source: 2002-q4/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 Hi, On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 19:38, Andrew Haley wrote: > Mark Wielaard writes: > > But the question is, what is considered The Specification? > > I use The Java Class Libraries books a lot when implementing classes. > > And since it describes the child variants it could also be argued that > > the online API doc (and most implementations except for Kaffe) is > > flawed. > > What version of Java is The Java Class Libraries, Volume 1, Second > Edition supposed to document? The 1.1 version of the Class libraries. The Supplemental gives that changes for 1.2. Cheers, Mark